Back

Validation of TRIzol-Based Inactivation Protocol with Failure Scenario Testing for Bacterial Select Agent Surrogates

Shahid, U. R.; Lueth, P. A.; Bellaire, B. H.

2026-02-22 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.22.707045 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Validated inactivation procedures are required for the safe handling and downstream analysis of highly pathogenic organisms, particularly those categorized as biological select agents and toxins (BSATs). TRIzol-based extraction methods are widely used for nucleic acid and protein isolation, yet their reliability for bacterial inactivation has not been comprehensively evaluated. In this study, we assessed TRIzol-based extraction methods for sample quality and inactivation reliability across a series of mock failure scenarios using five attenuated bacterial isolates: Francisella tularensis holarctica LVS, Bacillus anthracis Sterne, Yersinia enterocolitica, Mycobacterium marinum, and Burkholderia cepacia. Dilution of TRIzol to induce incomplete cell lysis for the initial extraction step, including 0% TRIzol, consistently inactivated all surrogate organisms, suggesting that downstream precipitation and sample washing reagents, including isopropanol and 70% ethanol, were sufficient to inactivate organisms in the absence of TRIzol. Several protocol failure scenarios were then evaluated to simulate human error by omitting extraction, precipitation, and washing steps individually or in combination for the most resistant organism, B. anthracis Sterne strain. Failure-scenario testing demonstrated that reliable inactivation of B. anthracis required strict adherence to the complete protocol due to the spore-forming ability of B. anthracis. Collectively, this work provides a reference with experimental evidence supporting the use of TRIzol-based extraction as a bacterial inactivation strategy for a wide range of bacterial pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
4
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
5
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
11
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.2%
15
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
17
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
18
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%