Back

Maternal Willingness to Participate in Research Involving Neuroimaging, Biological Sample Collection, and Data Storage: Towards a Multicentre Neurodevelopmental Research in a low-resource setting

Piersson, A. D.; Amartey, C.; Quartei, S. T.; Dzefi-Tettey, K.; Sefogah, P. E.; Lopez, A. R.

2026-02-24 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.02.22.26346849 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMaternal participation in neurodevelopmental research involving neuroimaging and diverse biological samples is essential for understanding prenatal influences on early brain development, yet willingness in low-resource settings remains underexplored. MethodWe surveyed 300 mothers using a structured questionnaire to assess willingness to undergo brain health testing (with a focus on electroencephalography [EEG] and brain magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), provide biological samples (blood, stool, urine, breast milk, placenta, amniotic fluid, vaginal/nasal fluid, saliva, tears), and consent to 10-year storage. Responses were analysed to examine associations between maternal sociodemographic factors and willingness to consent for each research component. ResultsNinety-two percent of participants expressed willingness for brain health testing, including [~]82% and [~]88% interest in EEG and MRI, respectively, even for untreatable conditions. Self-reported histories of foetal defects (5.3%) and birth defects (7.3%) were notably low. Biospecimen acceptance was highest (>95%) for routine samples (blood, stool, urine) but significantly low for sensitive specimens (breast milk, placenta, amniotic fluid: 51-55%) including (vaginal fluid, saliva, tears: 16-47%). Higher levels of maternal education consistently predicted consent across modalities, while being in a relationship increased willingness for stool, urine, placenta, amniotic fluid, MRI, and EEG. Low income reduced uptake for placenta, amniotic fluid, MRI, and EEG. Only 48% consented to 10-year storage of images and samples for future research. ConclusionThis study demonstrates high maternal willingness for neurodevelopmental research involving brain health testing and routine biospecimens in a low-resource setting. The findings highlight the feasibility of such protocols in a low-resource setting while exposing persistent inequities that risk underrepresenting disadvantaged mothers in maternal-child brain research. Contextually tailored consent models and capacity-building initiatives will be essential to ensure equitable, sustainable engagement across diverse LMIC populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
19.0%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.8%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
4
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
6
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
8
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
10
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
17
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Journal of Global Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Appetite
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.0%
23
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%