Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, low-density lipoproteins, and risk of abdominal aortic aneurysm
Yuan, S.; Bjornson, E.; Shakt, G.; Dinatale, T.; Lynch, J.; Temel, R. E.; Lu, H. S.; Daugherty, A.; Chang, K.-M.; Tsao, P.; Adkar, S. S.; Levin, M.; Damrauer, S. M.; Leeper, N. M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe comparative roles of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) pathogenesis are unclear. ObjectivesTo evaluate the putative causal role of TRLs in AAA, quantify the relative effect on AAA risk ("aneurysmogenicity") of TRL vs LDL particles, and prioritize lipid-lowering drug targets for AAA prevention and treatment. MethodsWe performed summary-level and individual-level Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Genetic variants were selected from 383,983 UK Biobank participants and ranked into 10 sets of variants where set 1 predominantly affected LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and set 10 predominantly affected TRL cholesterol (TRL-C; and with mixed effects for intermediate variant sets). AAA outcome data were obtained from AAAgen (37,214 cases), FinnGen (4,439 cases), and the VA Million Veteran Program (MVP; 23,848 cases). Multivariable MR was used to assess the independent roles of LDL-C and TRL-C in AAA. For each set of variants, MR or logistic regression was used to estimate AAA odds ratios (ORs) per 10 mg/dL higher apolipoprotein B (apoB). Interaction analyses were conducted between a statin-like LDL-C-lowering variant set (set 3) and a TRL-C-lowering variant set (set 10). Drug-target MR was performed to evaluate lipid-lowering targets relevant to LDL-C- and TRL-C-lowering. ResultsGenetically predicted LDL-C and TRL-C concentrations were each associated independently with genetic liability for AAA after mutual adjustment, with 3.0 to 5.5 times stronger associations for TRL-C compared to LDL-C on a per-cholesterol basis. In AAAgen, the AAA OR per 10 mg/dL increased apoB concentrations were 1.10 (95% CI, 1.05-1.14) for variant set 1 (LDL-C-predominant) and 1.89 (95% CI, 1.69-2.11) for variant set 10 (TRL-C-predominant). Using the ratio of log(OR) per 10 mg/dL apoB for set 10 versus set 1 as a conservative estimate of relative aneurysmogenicity, TRLs were approximately 3.2 to 6.9 times more aneurysmogenic than LDLs across the three studies. No evidence of interaction was observed between LDLs and TRLs, indicating additive contribution to AAA risk. Drug-target MR supported strong protective associations for genetically proxied inhibition of TRL-pathway targets, particularly APOC3 and LPL, with AAA risk. ConclusionsTRLs are at least threefold more aneurysmogenic than LDLs on a per-particle basis. Therapeutic strategies targeting TRL-C --especially via APOC3 and LPL--should be prioritized for AAA prevention and treatment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 95%
- Dissecting the Genetic Architecture of Intracranial Aneurysms 94%
- Population genomic screening leads to improved lipid management in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Protective Role For Smooth Muscle Cell Hepcidin In Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 94%
- Inducible Depletion of Calpain-2 Mitigates Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Mice 93%
- Sex-specific risk of smoking for abdominal aortic aneurysm and exploration of potential mechanism: meta-analysis and prospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- Targeting of scavenger receptors Stabilin-1 and Stabilin-2 ameliorates atherosclerosis by a plasma proteome switch mediating monocyte/macrophage suppression 92%
- Second Heart Field-derived Cells Contribute to Angiotensin II-mediated Ascending Aortopathies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.