End-to-End PET/CT Interpretation and Quantification with an LLM-Orchestrated AI Agent: A Real-World Pilot Study
Choi, H.; Bae, S.; Na, K. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough deep learning models have improved individual PET analysis, image processing and quantification tasks, end-to-end automation from raw DICOM to quantitative clinical reporting remains limited, particularly in heterogeneous real-world settings. MethodsAs a proof-of-concept, an autonomous large language model (LLM)-orchestrated multi-tool agent for end-to-end PET/CT interpretation was developed. A reasoning-based text LLM selected appropriate series from raw DICOM, coordinated registration and SUV conversion, invoked segmentation and detection tools, generated maximum-intensity projections, called a vision-enabled LLM for interpretation, and synthesized structured draft reports. The system was retrospectively evaluated in 170 patients undergoing baseline FDG PET/CT for lung cancer staging, using expert reports as reference. ResultsThe agent successfully completed the full end-to-end workflow from raw DICOM selection to structured draft report generation without human intervention in all 170 examinations. Primary tumor detection achieved 100% sensitivity. For nodal involvement, sensitivity was 84.8% and specificity was 39.4%, whereas distant metastasis detection showed 70.2% sensitivity and 65.0% specificity. Discrepancy analysis of 58 nodal and 57 metastatic mismatch cases revealed systematic false-positive findings related to reactive or physiologic uptake and false-negative findings involving small-volume or anatomically atypical metastases. ConclusionLLM-orchestrated PET/CT agents can enable workflow-level automation from raw DICOM to quantification and structured draft reporting under real-world conditions. Although primary tumor detection was highly reliable, nodal and metastatic assessment revealed systematic limitations, supporting a collaborative role with continued expert oversight in complex clinical scenarios.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Empowering PET Imaging Reporting with Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models and Reading Reports Database: A Pilot Single Center Study 95%
- Co-clinical FDG-PET Radiomic Signature in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple Negative Breast Cancer 93%
- Automated Long Axial Field of View PET Image Processing and Kinetic Modelling with the TurBO Toolbox 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations 91%
- The clinician-AI interface: intended use and explainability in FDA-cleared AI devices for medical image interpretation 90%
- A human-in-the-loop explanation framework for morphologically transparent AI predictions from whole-slide images 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 92%
- Photon-counting cine-cardiac CT in the mouse 90%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 91%
- From Community Acquired Pneumonia to COVID-19: A Deep Learning Based Method for Quantitative Analysis of COVID-19 on thick-section CT Scans 89%
- First-generation clinical dual-source photon-counting CT: ultra-low dose quantitative spectral imaging 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence System Reduces False-Positive Findings in the Interpretation of Breast Ultrasound Exams 90%
- Knowledge Connector: Decision support system for multiomics-based precision oncology 89%
- Features fusion or not: harnessing multiple pathological foundation models using Meta-Encoder for downstream tasks fine-tuning 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.