Back

Explainable advanced electrocardiography predicts coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography

Rajamohan, M.; Loewenstein, D. E.; Maanja, M.; Al-Falahi, Z.; Kuhasri, A.; Yang, K. X.; Cheepvasarach, C.; Lindow, T.; Schlegel, T.; Wen, Y.; Gladding, P. A.; Ugander, M.; Kozor, R.

2026-02-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.02.21.26346770 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDConventional electrocardiography (ECG) has limited diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with stable chest pain. Advanced electrocardiography (A-ECG) may improve diagnostic performance. The study aimed to derive, externally validate, and prognostically validate an explainable A-ECG score for detecting CAD on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). METHODSParticipants attending an outpatient rapid access chest pain clinic (RACC) underwent a standard 12-lead ECG and CCTA. Any CAD was defined as any calcified or non-calcified plaque. Elastic net with nested resampling was used to derive an A-ECG score using measures from the conventional ECG, derived vectorcardiography, and measures of waveform complexity. RESULTSIn the derivation cohort (n=171, age 59{+/-}13 years, 60% male), n=99 (58%) had any CAD on CCTA. A seven parameter A-ECG score to detect any CAD was derived. In an external validation cohort (n=773, age 57{+/-}12 years, 49% male, n=433 (56%) with any CAD), the score had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval] of 0.66 [0.63-0.70] for detecting any CAD, and 0.72 [0.68-0.76] for detecting any coronary artery calcification. In the UK Biobank (n=27,239, 966 events, follow-up 1.9 [0.7-4.4] years, age 66{+/-}8 years, 50% female), higher A-ECG scores were associated with cardiovascular events even after adjusting for age, sex and cardiovascular risk factors (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONSAn explainable A-ECG model, incorporating demographic and electrocardiographic features, demonstrated modest but externally reproducible discrimination for CCTA-defined coronary atherosclerosis and independent prognostic association in a large population cohort. This scalable, low-cost approach may aid triage and risk stratification in chest pain pathways.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.8%
4
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
13
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
14
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
16
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
21
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
23
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%