Back

Reclaiming health: a qualitative, explorative study of long covid recovery journeys involving mind-body approaches.

Deurman, C.; Brinkman, V.; Slagboom, M.; Bussemaker, J.; Vos, H. M. M.

2026-02-23 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.21.26345052 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study explored the recovery experiences of individuals who report having (largely) recovered from long covid and who attributed their improvement to mind-body approaches. Design, setting and participantsWe conducted an explorative qualitative study using purposive recruitment through social media and snowball sampling. Eighteen adult women (aged 37-62 years), who self-identified as having had long covid and having substantially recovered through mind-body approaches participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using Saunders practical thematic analysis. ResultsDespite variation in personal narratives, a common trajectory emerged: participants moved away from a biomedical explanatory model towards one centred on nervous system dysregulation. This shift, sometimes following initial scepticism, was often described as a turning point, sparking hope and motivation to engage in self-directed strategies. Recovery was not linear but an iterative process, involving cycles of practice, reflection (especially when progress stagnated) and adaptation of mind-body techniques. Over time, participants gained insights into contributing factors and, in many cases, made intentional life changes to support ongoing recovery. These patterns echo findings from previous research on mind-body approaches in chronic pain and chronic fatigue, and align with neuroscientific perspectives on symptom generation. Most participants navigated this process without formal clinical support, relying instead on online communities and actively avoiding sources of (biomedical) information that conflicted with their new understanding. ConclusionsWhile causal inferences cannot be drawn from qualitative data, this study highlights potential mechanisms that may underpin recovery for people with long covid using mind-body approaches. Further research is needed to develop structured interventions, and to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Future research should also explore how prevailing narratives within healthcare and society influence treatment engagement and recovery trajectories. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIThis is the first study exploring experiences of recovery from long covid using mind-body approaches. C_LIO_LIIn-depth, real-world accounts capture the lived-experiences over time and allow in-depth exploration if the recovery process, while the semi-structured design facilitates the emergence of themes rarely captured in clinical research. C_LIO_LIGeneralisability is limited due to self-identified long covid status, lack of formal diagnostic verification, absence of strict definitions of mind-body approaches and recovery, and a relatively homogenous sample (mostly highly educated women). C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
27.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
4
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
5
Journal of Sleep Research
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
8
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
16
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
22
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
24
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
29
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%