Back

Australian giant kelp genome assemblies show distinct Southern Hemisphere genetics

Scharfenstein, H. J.; Carroll, A.; Iha, C.; Schwoerbel, J.; Jordan, R.; Willis, A.

2026-02-21 genomics
10.64898/2026.02.20.707121 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, occurs across northern and southern Hemisphere temperate coasts and is at high risk from ocean warming. Few giant kelp forests remain across the Southeast Australian shelf, while a handful of forests are actively being restored. Genomic resources can greatly aid in the conservation of remnant populations and enhance restoration efforts. Reference genomes are a fundamental resource as they are a prerequisite to, or enhance, many analyses used in conservation genomics. A single reference genome is available for giant kelp, assembled from a Californian haploid specimen. However, increasing evidence of genetic divergence between Northern and Southern Hemisphere populations highlights the need for regionally representative reference genomes. Here, we present two genome assemblies from the diploid vegetative tissue of Australian giant kelp specimens. We performed de novo genome assembly using long-read sequencing (PacBio HiFi and ONT R10.4 Simplex) and scaffolded the assemblies with the ONT reads, assembling 98-99% of the genomes into 35 pseudo-chromosomes. Genome sizes ranged from 528-534 Mbp, with BUSCO completeness scores of 97-98% and QV scores of 51-52. Genome annotation identified 17,565-17,800 genes in the Australian genomes. Genomic divergence between the Australian and Californian giant kelp genomes was seven-fold greater than between Australian genomes (1.5% vs 0.2%), supporting a Northern-Southern Hemisphere genetic divergence. Functional divergence was also observed between Australian and Californian genomes, reflected by differing patterns of enrichment in gene ontologies linked to energy metabolism, proteostasis and stress responses. These two new genome assemblies will serve as valuable resources for ongoing research into Southern Hemisphere giant kelp genetics, while providing the basis for genomic-guided conservation and restoration of remnant giant kelp forests in Australia.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.2%
4
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
7
Journal of Heredity
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
17
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
DNA Research
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%