Back

A Scalable Design for Proximity-Inducing Molecules

Karaj, E.; Venkatarangan, V.; Sindi, S. H.; Siriwongsup, S.; Lee, C.; Pergu, R.; Vedagopuram, S.; Kailass, K.; Tran, K.; Singh, P.; Singh, S.; Kawai, J.; Fung, J. E.; Tefera, M.; Dhaliwal, R.; Chaudhary, S. K.; Keyes, A.; Sadagopan, A.; Boatner, L.; Shah, N. H.; Fehl, C.; Backus, K. M.; Choudhary, A.

2026-02-21 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.02.20.706349 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chimeric molecules, which bring together an effector enzyme and a protein-of-interest (POI) to add/remove post-translational modifications (PTMs), are furnishing transformative modalities (e.g., PROTACs). However, these chimeras scalability is limited as they employ rare, non-inhibitory binders of effectors. We report GRoup-transfer chimeras for Inducing Proximity (GRIPs) that employ abundantly available effectors inhibitors to append POI binder on the effector using group-transfer handles. To demonstrate scalability, we develop 6 GRIPs classes for 3 PTMs utilizing diverse inhibitor, spanning 16 effector-POI pairs. Furthermore, we report a toolbox of 42 tunable group-transfer handles for Cys/Lys residues and [~]5000 inhibitor-residue pairs for diverse effectors. Using global proteomics, we confirm the specificity for group transfer and PTM editing. GRIPs endowed new functionalities to POI drugs, including preventing rebound signaling upon drug withdrawal, a more potent/persistent inhibition, and inhibitor-induced pathway activation in 4 fully-endogenous systems. In diverse hemi-endogenous systems (tagged POI), GRIPs induced condensate formation with reduced off-targets, cleared pathogenic PTMs, and initiated PTM crosstalk. Overall, GRIPs provide a scalable and versatile platform for PTM editing. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=184 SRC="FIGDIR/small/706349v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e443e5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1259756org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f2b291org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a96191_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 9%
16.7%
3
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
4
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.0%
6
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.1%
7
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
8
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.5%
9
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.9%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.2%
11
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
12
Nature Nanotechnology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.0%
14
Cell Chemical Biology
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.2%
17
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
18
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Nature Chemistry
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Nature Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%