Back

Carotid plaque dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging normalised signal intensity reproducibly differs between plaque and vessel wall

Readford, T. R.; Martinez, G. J.; Patel, S.; Kench, P. L.; Andia, M. E.; Ugander, M.; Giannotti, N.

2026-02-23 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.02.20.26346739 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) enables non-invasive characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaque. PurposeTo evaluate the performance and reproducibility of a simplified DCE-MRI quantification method for carotid plaque assessment. MethodsT1-weighted black-blood DCE-MRI of the carotid arteries at 3T was performed at baseline and after six months in patients with mild-to-moderate atherosclerotic lesions in a pilot placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluating the effects of low-dose (0.5mg daily) colchicine therapy on carotid plaque volume. DCE-MRI signal intensity was measured in manually drawn regions of interest in the plaque core, remote non-atherosclerotic vessel wall, and skeletal muscle. Peak signal intensities were normalized to skeletal muscle signal in the same slice. ResultsIn patients (n=28, median [interquartile range] age 72 [64-74] years, 36% female, n=13/15 colchicine/placebo), normalized peak signal intensity was higher in the plaque core than in the remote vessel wall at both baseline (3.5 [2.3-4.1] vs 2.1 [1.7-2.5], p<0.001) and follow-up (3.2 [2.5-4.4] vs 2.0 [1.7-2.5], p<0.001). Measurements did not differ between baseline and follow-up for all patients (0.7{+/-}0.7 for plaque core, 0.6{+/-}0.4 for remote vessel wall, p>0.80 for both) nor between colchicine intervention and placebo control (p>0.35 for either region). ConclusionsNormalised peak signal intensity on DCE-MRI was consistently higher in the carotid plaque core than in the remote vessel wall, showed excellent reproducibility in both regions over six months, and was not altered by colchicine treatment. This simplified, muscle-normalised approach may facilitate future studies exploring DCE-MRI measures potentially related to plaque vulnerability.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.4%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.1%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.4%
11
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
15
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%