Back

Validation and Extension of a Risk Calculator to Predict Mood Recurrence in Young People with Bipolar Disorder

Avolio, A.; Merranko, J.; Gill, M. K.; Levenson, J. C.; Goldstein, T. R.; Hafeman, D.; Birmaher, B.

2026-03-02 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.20.26346717 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveGiven the episodic nature of bipolar disorder (BD) and the variability in mood episode recurrence across individuals, accurate recurrence prediction is critical. The original COBY recurrence risk calculator (RC) was developed in a longitudinal youth cohort to estimate threshold recurrence risk. However, its accuracy for predicting subthreshold recurrences had not been fully evaluated. The objective of this study was to extend the previously developed COBY mood recurrence RC to predict both threshold and subthreshold mood recurrences and evaluate its performance in an independent sample. MethodAdolescents and young adults with BD-I/II (N= 51; BD-I: 38, BD-II: 13; 14-24 years old) were interviewed with standard instruments at intake and during the follow-up on average every 6 months for a median of 54 weeks. We assessed the degree to which the COBY RC predicted mood recurrence (threshold or subthreshold) in this independent sample. Discrimination was measured using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC); calibration and variable importance were also assessed. ResultsThe model demonstrated good prediction of any recurrence within the next six months (any threshold recurrence AUC = 0.72, any subthreshold or worse recurrence AUC = 0.77). Calibration analysis demonstrated the model tended to overestimate risk in the external sample, plausibly attributable to differences in recurrence ascertainment strategy (prospective vs retrospective) or the significant difference in prior remission length, a key predictor. Recalibration greatly improved calibration without loss of discrimination. ConclusionThe mood recurrence RC demonstrated good discrimination for both threshold and subthreshold mood recurrences in an independent young adult cohort, consistent with prior youth and adult validations. Validation now spans across developmental stages and different degrees of severity of mood symptoms opening the opportunity for clinical implementation to provide personalized monitoring and early intervention for people with BD.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
44.4%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
5
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.3%
7
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
12
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
23
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%