Improving Equity in Maternity Care Through Linguistically Accessible Parent Education Classes: A Proposal for London-Wide Mapping and Evaluation

BackgroundWomen with limited or no English proficiency experience persistent barriers to accessing maternity care in the UK, contributing to well-documented inequalities in maternal and perinatal outcomes. NHS parent education classes are predominantly delivered in English, and provision of multilingual classes within individual maternity units is often limited and duplicative. Evidence to inform collaborative, cross-trust service models remains scarce. ObjectiveTo assess womens access to, preferences for, and perceived relevance of NHS parent education classes, with particular focus on willingness to travel across London to attend classes delivered in a preferred language, in order to inform equitable and efficient service design. MethodsA cross-sectional, multilingual survey was conducted as a quality improvement initiative across multiple London maternity networks. The survey was translated into 18 languages and captured sociodemographic characteristics, access to parent education, preferences for delivery format, timing, location, and language, and perceived relevance of content. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively and thematically. ResultsA total of 97 women participated in the survey (n=97), the majority of whom reported speaking at least one non-English language at home (79.4%, n=77). Regarding mode of delivery, 51.6% of women preferred in-person parent education classes (n=50), 15.5% preferred online delivery (n=15), and 32.9% reported no preference (n=32). Most participants reported access to a suitable device and reliable internet (85.6%, n=83) and confidence using online platforms (77.3%, n=75). In relation to timing and format, weekends were the most commonly preferred time for classes (40.2%, n=39), followed by weekdays during school hours (35.1%, n=34) and weekday evenings (24.7%, n=24). Nearly half of women preferred delivery across two 2-hour sessions (48.5%, n=47), while 30.9% reported no preference regarding session length or number (n=30); fewer preferred two 3-hour sessions (11.3%, n=11) or a single 4-hour session (8.3%, n=8). Regarding willingness to travel, 67.0% of participants reported they would attend parent education classes delivered outside their booking maternity unit (n=65). Overall, 68.0% were willing to travel up to 45 minutes for in-person classes (n=66), while 29.9% preferred not to travel (n=29). With respect to language of delivery, 40.2% of women preferred classes delivered in their native language (n=39), and a further 40.2% reported English with an interpreter as acceptable (n=39); fewer were comfortable relying on a partner or friend to translate (19.6%, n=19). Most participants perceived that delivery by a native-speaking health professional would improve trust and learning (75.3%, n=73), and an equal proportion expressed a preference for a female interpreter (75.3%, n=73). ConclusionsWomen with limited English proficiency demonstrate clear willingness to travel across maternity networks to access antenatal education in their preferred language. These findings support the development of collaborative, cross-trust models that standardise core antenatal content while centralising multilingual provision, reducing duplication and improving equity of access across London maternity services.