Randomized Trial Protocol: Epic Generative AI Chart Summarization Tool to Reduce Ambulatory Provider Cognitive Task Load
Chin, A. T.; Zhu, N.; Kingsley, T. C.; Mynampati, P.; Phipps, Y.; Romanov, A.; Vangala, S.; Weng, M.; Wisk, L. E.; Woo, H.; Mafi, J. N.; Lukac, P. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundEHR documentation and chart review contribute to clinician workload and burnout. To alleviate pre-charting burden, Epic has released a new generative AI chart summarizer tool, which has become widely adopted; however, its impact has not been examined in randomized trials. ObjectiveTo evaluate whether access to an Epic generative AI chart summarization tool reduces cognitive task load among ambulatory providers compared with usual care. MethodsTwo-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial among ambulatory clinicians across multiple specialties. Clinicians will be randomized 1:1 to tool access versus usual care for 90 days. The primary outcome is change in a 4-item physician task load (PTL) adapted for the pre-charting task. Exploratory outcomes include EHR-derived time metrics (Caboodle and Signal), professional fulfillment/burnout (PFI), usability (SUS), clinician satisfaction, aggregated patient experience item from CG-CAHPS, and reported safety related metrics. Ethics and DisseminationAnalyses will use clinician-level survey responses and aggregated EHR metrics; no patient-level protected health information will be included in the analytic dataset. Results will be disseminated via preprint and peer-reviewed publication. Article summary - Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThis study is a 3-month pragmatic randomized controlled trial evaluating a native EHR-embedded generative AI tool that summarizes prior clinical notes for ambulatory encounters. C_LIO_LIThe primary outcome uses a validated cognitive task load instrument adapted specifically for pre-charting activities. C_LIO_LIExploratory outcomes include objective EHR-derived time metrics, validated psychometric measures of burnout and professional fulfillment, and clinician-reported survey measures assessing perceived usefulness of the tool. C_LIO_LIThe trial is single-centered, which may limit generalizabilty, and the intervention is optional-use and unblinded, which may attenuate observed effects and introduce performance bias. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Apple Watch and Withings Evaluation of Symptoms, Treatment, and Rhythm in those Undergoing Cardioversion (AWE STRUCk): A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- RESEARCH PROTOCOL: Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus 91%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 93%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 93%
- Heterogeneity of Diagnosis and Documentation of Post-COVID Conditions in Primary Care: A Machine Learning Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 93%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 93%
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 94%
- Strategies and Tools for electronic health records and physician workflow alignment: A scoping review protocol 93%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.