Back

Landrace and bred accessions of allotetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) reveal variation in subgenome dosage and subgenome expression bias

Rhoades, K. E. B.; Goeckeritz, C. Z.; Bird, K. A.; Yocca, A. E.; Edger, P. P.; Iezzoni, A.

2026-02-20 genetics
10.64898/2026.02.19.706907 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Subgenome dominance is a phenomenon observed in many allopolyploids where one parental genome exhibits stronger influence over phenotype than the other parental genomes. This may present as preferential retention of one subgenome through fractionation, replacement via homoeologous exchange, or as subgenome expression bias, where one subgenome is expressed at a higher abundance compared to other subgenomes. Sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) is an allotetraploid fruit tree species resulting from an interspecific cross between extant relatives of ground cherry (P. fruticosa) and sweet cherry (P. avium). Prior comparative genomic analyses suggest that the sour cherry cultivar Montmorency contains three subgenomes. Subgenomes A and A, each present in one copy, are derived from a P. fruticosa-like ancestor, and B, present in two copies, is derived from a P. avium-like ancestor. In this study we investigated the subgenome dynamics of the three subgenomes of sour cherry in four diverse landraces and two cultivars, including Montmorency. We found evidence of 26 homoeologous exchange events and five whole-homoeolog replacements relative to Montmorency in three of the six accessions. We also detected subgenome expression bias favoring the A and A subgenomes over the B subgenome, the magnitude of which differs between accessions and changes over the course of fruit development. Lastly, we show differences in dosage variation and expression bias of four previously-described genes in Montmorency associated with fruit softening, a key trait in this crop. These findings on subgenome dominance offer valuable insights into how this phenomenon may influence traits important for sour cherry breeding.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
2
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
4
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
6
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
10
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
11
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
13
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
14
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
15
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
17
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
25
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
26
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%