Ruminosignatures associated with methane emissions and feed efficiency across geographies and cattle breeds
Vourlaki, I.-T.; Furman, O.; Tapio, I.; Guan, L. L.; Waters, S. M.; Kenny, D.; Smith, P.; Kirwan, S. F.; Kelly, D.; Evans, R.; Quintanilla, R.; Reverter, A.; Alexandre, P. A.; Li, F.; Garnsworthy, P. C.; Bani, P.; Pope, P. B.; Morgavi, D. P.; Mizrahi, I.; Ramayo-Caldas, Y.
Show abstract
The cattle rumen microbiota represents a highly complex and dynamic ecosystem, whose organization and connection to host phenotypes are of the highest importance to food security and the environment. In this study, we analyzed the rumen microbiota, from 2,492 cattle belonging to five different breeds and production systems across five countries, categorizing them into microbial co-abundance groups referred to as Ruminosignatures. We identified twelve distinct Ruminosignatures, including two that were consistently observed across all populations and were dominated by the genus Prevotella and UBA2810. Additional Ruminosignatures showed breed-and diet-specific patterns and collectively explained 96-99% of the variance in rumen microbial composition. The abundances of several Ruminosignatures were associated with methane emissions and feed efficiency, and were influenced by host genetics, with heritability estimates ranging from 0.09 to 0.51. The Ruminosignature dominated by UAB2810 was negatively associated with methane emissions across all datasets and positively linked to feed efficiency in Holstein from Italy and crossbred from Ireland. Additionally, the type of production system affects both the occurrence of Ruminosignatures and their impact on host phenotypes, emphasizing the need for context-specific approaches to modulate the rumen microbiome. Overall, our results offer new perspectives on the assembly of ruminal microbes and underscore the potential of the Ruminosignatures framework for microbiome-informed precision agriculture and breeding initiatives aimed at enhancing feed efficiency and minimizing the environmental impact of cattle farming.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.