Back

Spatial confinement of gene drives: Assessing risk of failure using global sensitivity analysis

Butler, C. D.; Lloyd, A. L.

2026-02-19 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706608 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Gene drives allow pest populations to be genetically modified to reduce their harm on agriculture and human health. The genetic modification, or payload, spreads within a target population at rates exceeding normal Mendelian inheritance. While gene drives have demonstrated immense potential in laboratory populations, they present unique challenges. Foremost among these challenges is spatial confinement, or ensuring that the payload remains confined to target populations. However, there is an inherent tension between gene drive spread and spatial confinement: increasing the spreading efficiency of a gene drive increases the risk of escape, while engineering confinement mechanisms increases the risk of gene drive extinction. In this work, we explore spatial outcomes in gene drives designed for spatial confinement and the dependence of these outcomes on target organism dispersal and payload fitness cost. We use a stochastic spatial model to compute the probability of failure for each gene drive, and use techniques from global sensitivity analysis to quantify the contribution of dispersal and fitness cost to variance in gene drive performance. Our findings reveal how spatial outcomes are affected by key parameters, and how this sensitivity varies tremendously between different gene drives. These spatial properties can be used to classify gene drive behavior and are useful to determine suitability for a particular application.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.3%
4
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
9
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
21
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
30
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.5%