Back

A citywide metagenomic analysis reveals surface-specific microbiome and resistome patterns in outdoor urban environments across Liverpool, UK.

Ackers Johnson, G.; O'Ferrall, A. M.; Holmes, A.; Allman, E.; Ambrose, P.; Breen, A.; Cutcliffe, A.; D'Arcy, K.; Goodman, R.; Kingdon, A.; McLeman, A.; Moyo, S.; Pulmones, R.; Deb Rajib, M.; Sharma, P.; Shore, E.; Clerkin, K.; Moore, M.; McNeil, H.; Roberts, A. P.

2026-02-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urbanisation is rapidly increasing worldwide, with increasing attention focused on its consequences for human populations and the environment. Despite the importance of outdoor urban environments for biodiversity and human wellbeing, their microbial ecology remains poorly characterised, particularly in relation to emerging microbial threats including antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Here, we present a citywide metagenomic study of outdoor public surfaces across Liverpool, United Kingdom, examining microbial community composition, diversity, and antimicrobial resistance gene (ARG) distribution across five distinct surface types. We show that patterns of human activity and surface use strongly influence both microbial community structure and AMR signatures in outdoor urban environments. Touchpoints were enriched for human-associated taxa and exhibited the highest overall resistome burdens, whereas Pathway and Waterside niches showed no strong taxonomic enrichment and exhibited low ARG prevalence. Refuse surfaces showed mixed patterns, characterised by sporadic but occasionally high-abundance ARG detections. Soil harboured the most distinct microbial communities but showed minimal ARG prevalence, which may partly reflect the limited representation of environmental taxa in current ARG databases. This study provides a baseline for understanding how urban infrastructure and behaviour shape microbial and resistance landscapes, and highlights the value of outdoor metagenomic surveillance for future environmental and public health research.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.6%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
7.8%
3
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
6
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.0%
7
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.0%
8
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
10
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.4%
11
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.6%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
14
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
15
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
17
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
18
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
19
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
21
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
24
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
26
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%