Molecular and Structural Reprogramming of Gastric Cancer Revealed by Systems-Level Transcriptomic Analysis
Mottaghi-Dastjerdi, N.; Soltany-Rezaee-Rad, M.
Show abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a major cause of cancer mortality and remains difficult to diagnose early and treat effectively. Although transcriptomic profiling has defined extensive molecular heterogeneity, many studies are not anchored to clinicopathological variables or interpreted in the context of tissue-level pathobiology. We applied an integrative transcriptomic and network-based framework to identify molecular signatures that reflect structural and biochemical reprogramming of gastric tissue during malignant transformation. RNA-seq expression profiles and clinical annotations were analyzed using non-parametric differential expression filtering, functional enrichment, and protein-protein interaction network modeling. Expression patterns were further evaluated across clinicopathological strata (stage, grade, nodal status, and metastasis) and by network-informed clustering. Across clinical strata, GC showed a consistent signature of developmental reactivation and loss of gastric epithelial identity. Developmental regulators, most prominently HOX-cluster genes and the histone variant HIST1H3J, were upregulated, consistent with epigenetic/chromatin reprogramming. In parallel, gastric differentiation and secretory lineage markers (ATP4A, KCNE2, PTF1A, VSTM2A) were persistently downregulated, reflecting suppression of parietal/ductal programs and altered metabolic/secretory function. ADIPOQ demonstrated stage-dependent repression and was associated with poorer survival, supporting a context-dependent prognostic role. Enrichment and network analyses also highlighted FGFR-centered signaling as a dominant oncogenic axis linked to proliferation and invasion. This study identifies a molecular pathology framework in which GC progression involves coordinated chromatin-level developmental reprogramming and sustained loss of gastric differentiation programs, accompanied by FGFR-driven oncogenic signaling and stage-dependent metabolic disruption. These signatures provide candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and support prioritization of therapeutically actionable pathways in GC.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Epithelial and Stromal Immune Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Analysis Reveals Prognostic Factors with Digital Cytometry 95%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 94%
- A novel molecular analysis approach in colorectal cancer suggests new treatment opportunities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular subtyping improves prognostication of Stage 2 colorectal cancer 93%
- An integrative pan-cancer investigation reveals common genetic and transcriptional alterations of AMPK pathway genes as important predictors of clinical outcomes across major cancer types 93%
- Comparative Immune profiling in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Progression Among South African patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial tumour gene signature discriminates neoplastic from non-neoplastic compartments in colon cancer: unravelling predictive biomarkers for relapse 95%
- Panomics reveals patient-individuality as the major driver for colorectal cancer progression 93%
- FOXO1 mitigates the SMAD3/FOXL2C134W Transcriptomic Effect in a Model of Human Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deeper insights into long-term survival heterogeneity of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients using integrative individual- and group-level transcriptome network analyses 95%
- Multi-omic signatures identify pan-cancer classes of tumors beyond tissue of origin. 94%
- Loss of Y in regulatory T lymphocytes in the tumor micro-environment of primary colorectal cancers and liver metastases 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.