Back

A classification of structured coalescent processes with migration, conditional on the population pedigree

Lessard, S.; Easlick, T.; Wakeley, J.

2026-02-19 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recent analyses of the effects that organismal genealogies or pedigrees of populations have on times to common ancestry for samples of genetic data are extended to cases of population subdivision and migration. Traditional coalescent models marginalize over pedigrees. A finding of a pedigree effect implies that data analysis and interpretation should not be based on the corresponding traditional coalescent model but rather on a coalescent model obtained by conditioning on the pedigree. We apply a straightforward test based on the distribution of pairwise coalescence times to four previously described scenarios of subdivision and migration. These scenarios are defined by the relative magnitudes of four parameters: the number of the local populations or demes, the deme size, the migration fraction, and the probability that migration can occur at all. We find pedigree effects in three scenarios. In two, the effect is weak if the deme size is large. The one scenario without a pedigree effect corresponds to the well known structured-coalescent model. The one scenario with a persistent pedigree effect even in the limit as the deme size tends to infinity involves long periods without gene flow interrupted by pulses of migration. We illustrate our results using simulations and numerical analysis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
3
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
6
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 26%
2.4%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
13
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
14
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
15
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
16
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
18
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
24
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
28
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
30
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%