Back

Do anglers take the bait? Anglers' perceptions about fluvial barriers in three river basins in Northern Spain

Sanchez-Alcazar, A.; Miranda, R.; Galicia, D.; de Izeta-Zalduendo, L.; Barquin, J.; Gonzalez-Ferreras, A. M.; Penas, F. J.; Villarroya, A.

2026-02-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.02.18.706343 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Removing river barriers - such as dams or weirs - is an increasingly used strategy for restoring freshwater ecosystems. In Europe, these actions are key for achieving the goal of 25,000 kilometers of free-flowing rivers that the recent regulation on nature restoration establishes for 2030. However, social acceptance remains uneven, and local opposition--often related to cultural attachments, poor ecological awareness, and misinformation--may influence or even impede restoration efforts. Among stakeholders, anglers play a particularly influential role, yet their perceptions and knowledge remain poorly documented. This study addresses how anglers from three river basins in Northern Spain perceive river barriers, their removal, and their ecological impacts, and contrasts their attitudes to those of other residents. We carried out a telephone survey of 1,200 adult residents in the target basins. We assessed perceptions, misconceptions, and self-reported knowledge of river barriers, and collected various sociodemographic parameters. We selected 180 self-identified anglers and compared their answers to those from a subsample of 180 non-anglers with similar demographic characteristics. Despite reporting significantly higher self-perceived knowledge and more polarised responses, anglers showed lower awareness of the ecological impacts of fluvial barriers. They were more likely to underestimate their negative effects compared to the control group. In addition to falling for the main misconceptions surrounding the issue, their responses displayed a degree of bimodality, suggesting that the type of fishing practised may influence their attitudes. Our findings reaffirm the importance of strengthening awareness-raising efforts among relevant stakeholders about the impacts of river barriers and the benefits of their removal when planning specific interventions. It is essential to engage local communities--particularly key groups such as anglers--to strengthen the social acceptance of such actions and improve environmental governance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 4%
25.8%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.1%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.9%
8
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
23
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%