Mental health outcomes following a psilocybin session within Oregon's state-regulated model: A naturalistic study
Gow, A.; Shih, E.; Reid, R.; Qian, J. J.; Mellor, C.; McInnes, L. A.; Carhart-Harris, R.; Davis, J. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundIn 2020, Oregon became the first U.S. state to establish a regulated framework for adults to access psilocybin services using naturally-derived mushroom products. No studies have examined mental health outcomes among individuals receiving psilocybin in this context. AimsTo evaluate changes in self-reported symptoms of depression, anxiety, and well-being 30-days post-psilocybin session under the Oregon state-regulated model , and document session-related adverse events and doses consumed. MethodsThis was a naturalistic study (March 2024-April 2025) among adults [≥]21 years participating in a legal psilocybin services program. Online surveys were completed pre-session, 1-day, and 30-days post-session. Primary outcomes were change in depression, anxiety, and well-being symptoms pre-session to 30-days post-session evaluated using linear mixed-effects models (random effect: timepoint; fixed effects: sex, concurrent psychiatric medication use, age, session dose [total psilocybin equivalents, TPE, mg: psilocybin mg + 1.39 * psilocin mg]). Adverse events (e.g., hallucinogen persisting perception disorder [HPPD]) were assessed at 1-day and 30-days post-session. ResultsParticipants (n=88; median age 43 years; 52% male) were predominantly Oregon residents (53.4%), psychedelic-experienced (64.8%), and concurrently using psychiatric medication (46.6%). All outcomes improved significantly at 30-days post-session (p<0.001), including in sensitivity analyses stratified by concurrent psychiatric medication usage (p<0.001 all outcomes, both groups). Two participants (2.3%) reported symptoms consistent with HPPD at 1-day post-session, but none at 30-days. Mean dose was 27.8 mg (SD 8.2) TPE. ConclusionsPsilocybin sessions delivered under the Oregon regulatory model were associated with clinically meaningful improvements in depression, anxiety, and well-being 30-days post-session, supporting therapeutic effectiveness of legal psilocybin services.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence, Comorbidity, and Sociodemographic Correlates of Psychiatric Disorders in the All Of Us Biobank 95%
- Effect of everyday discrimination on depression and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large-scale, repeated-measures study in the All of Us Research Program 93%
- Decoding Treatment Choice: Genetic and Phenotypic Analyses of Long-term Antidepressant Acceptability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Associations of cannabis use, tobacco use and incident anxiety, mood, and psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- The Positive End of the Polygenic Score Distribution for ADHD: A Low Risk or a Protective Factor? 92%
- Effectiveness of attexis, a Digital Intervention Based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adults with ADHD: A Randomized Controlled Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 94%
- Educational attainment reduces the risk of suicide attempt among individuals with and without psychiatric disorders independent of cognition: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study with more than 815,000 participants 92%
- Emotional Adaptation During A Crisis: Decline in Anxiety and Depression After the Initial Weeks of COVID-19 in the United States 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A study of psychological pain in substance use disorder and its relationship to treatment outcome 94%
- Sequential Bilateral Accelerated Theta Burst Stimulation in Adolescents With Suicidal Ideation Associated With Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Can Psychedelic Use Benefit Meditation Practice? Examining Individual, Psychedelic, and Meditation-Related Factors 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.