Back

Genomic and clinical determinants of extraintestinal Clostridium perfringens infections in immunocompromised patients

Menif, B.; Wirth, S. E.; Wroblewski, D.; Connors, J.; Correa, N.; Delaney, M. L.; Bry, L.

2026-02-19 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346578 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClostridium perfringens can cause life-threatening extraintestinal infections in immunocompromised patients, an area in which we have little information regarding strain factors that impact patient risks and outcomes. MethodsWe conducted genomic-epidemiologic analyses on C. perfringens isolates from 70 patients seen at Brigham and Womens Hospital over 2021-2024. Genomic analyses evaluated strain profiles within a broader context of 2,321 C. perfringens genomes from foodborne, veterinary, clinical, and environmental sources to identify factors associated with invasive infections. ResultsOf 70 patients with C. perfringens infections (mean age 67.6 years), 32 had invasive infections, of which two-thirds had active malignancies, and more than half were immunocompromised. Patients with invasive infections had a significantly higher 90-day mortality of 43.8% vs. 18.4% (p=0.035) and a higher median Charlson Comorbidity Index (6 vs. 3; p=0.003). Notably, no patient isolates were clonal, verifying the absence of hospital-based transmission. Patient isolates showed increased carriage of hyaluronidases (nagHIJKL), sialidases (nanIJ), and perfringolysin O (pfoA). Genomic-epidemiologic analyses identified a new independent association between the NagL hyaluronidase (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.14 - 16.24) in highly morbid invasive infections. ConclusionWe present a comprehensive genomic analysis of C. perfringens and of strains infecting immunocompromised patients, including epidemiologic associations of the hyluronidase NagL, NanIJ sialidase, and perfringolysin O in highly morbid invasive infections. These genes provide potential markers to identify high morbidity strains that can infect these populations and to further elucidate their role in invasive infections.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
8.4%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
6
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
12
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.5%
16
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%