Back

Gestational Environment Captured by the Neonatal Metabolome is not Predictive of Later Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Fracchia, A.; Rudbaek, J. J.; Chakradeo, K.; Jess, T.; Ottosson, F.; Sazonovs, A.

2026-02-18 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346468 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGestational exposures may contribute to the newborns lifetime risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). While gestational influences are associated with IBD onset, the causality and confounding of such exposures are difficult to ascertain. The neonatal metabolome provides a metabolic snapshot of gestational influences. ObjectiveWe tested the neonatal metabolomes ability to predict future IBD, to assess whether gestational exposures are reflected in early molecular precursors of the disease. MethodsWe profiled dried blood spots from 520 newborns who later developed IBD and matched controls using high-resolution untargeted mass spectrometry metabolomics (1,350 QC-passing metabolites). Genotyping was available for 1,009 of these individuals. PERMANOVA confirmed assay sensitivity to gestational exposures, gradient boosting was used for prediction. ResultsThe neonatal metabolome significantly captured maternal smoking, birth weight, and gestational age (p < 0.001), but explained minimal variance in IBD status (R2 = 0.09%, p = 0.390) and showed no predictive power for IBD (AUC = 0.51, 95% CI 0.50-0.52, p = 0.585). Stratifying by disease subtype and age of onset did not improve performance. In contrast, genetic risk scores were modestly predictive (CD: AUC = 0.64, p < 5.11x10-14; UC: AUC = 0.63, p < 7.65x10-{superscript 1}{superscript 2}), but uncorrelated with neonatal metabolomic profiles (CD: p = 0.650; UC: p = 0.970), suggesting a later-age effect. ConclusionsUsing a large, comprehensively profiled cohort, we demonstrate that neonatal metabolomic profiles sensitively capture gestational signatures, but not the overall future IBD risk. Our findings suggest that most IBD risk accumulates later in life, beyond gestational molecular imprints.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.3%
2
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
10
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
15
Immunology & Cell Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Epigenomics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%