Back

Time to treatment initiation in pregnant women with tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa

Meehan, S.-A.; Hesseling, A. C.; Kalk, E.; Hughes, J. A.; Seddon, J. A.; Namukuta, V. E.; Osman, M.

2026-02-19 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.02.18.26346464 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB) incidence peaks in women during their reproductive years and is a leading cause of maternal mortality. Pregnant women with TB have a high risk of failure to initiate TB treatment and poor TB treatment and pregnancy outcomes. We determined the time to treatment initiation in pregnant women diagnosed with TB in a routine programmatic setting. MethodsUsing routine linked electronic data, we identified women 15-45 years of age with laboratory-confirmed and/or clinically diagnosed TB, October 2018-December 2020, in two high-burden sub-districts in Cape Town, South Africa. We compared demographic and clinical characteristics in women with TB by pregnancy status, used time-to-event analysis to determine the time from TB diagnosis to initiation of antituberculosis treatment and Cox regression to assess determinants of treatment initiation. ResultsOf 5,459 women diagnosed with TB, 292 (5.3%) were pregnant. The median age for pregnant women was 28.6 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23.7-33.7) and non-pregnant women 31 years (IQR:25.2-36.5). HIV prevalence was similar in pregnant (177/292; 60.6%) vs non-pregnant (3200/5167; 61.9%) women. Median time to treatment initiation was two days for pregnant and non-pregnant women. Most women initiated treatment within the first month after their TB diagnosis, after which the rate plateaued in both groups. Time to treatment initiation over 6 months was statistically different (Kaplan Meier Log-rank test, p = 0.0064) with pregnant women lagging behind non-pregnant women. ConclusionsMore than 5% of women diagnosed with TB were pregnant at the time of TB diagnosis. While pregnant women with TB were appropriately initiated on treatment, almost 15% were never started on treatment and there were delays in treatment initiation. While strategic interventions to prioritise early treatment initiation are needed, there should be a specific focus on pregnant women who have not initiated treatment within one month after TB diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.2%
4
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.7%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
10
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
15
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
26
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
28
Journal of Infection and Public Health
15 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
29
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%