MedOS: AI-XR-Cobot World Model for Clinical Perception and Action
Wu, Y. C.; Yin, M.; Shi, B.; Zhang, Z.; Yin, D.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Fan, J.; Jin, R.; Wang, H.; Ying, K.; Pang, K.; Rojansky, R.; Curtis, C.; Bao, Z.; Wang, M.; Cong, L.
Show abstract
Medicine historically separates abstract clinical reasoning from physical intervention. We bridge this divide with MedOS, a general-purpose embodied world model. Mimicking human cognition via a dual-system architecture, MedOS demonstrates superior reasoning on biomedical benchmarks and autonomously executes complex clinical research. To extend this intelligence physically, the system simulates medical procedures as a physics-aware model to foresee adverse events. Generating and validating on the MedSuperVision benchmark, MedOS exhibits spatial intelligence for reasoning and action. Crucially, we demonstrate that this platform democratizes clinical expertise and narrows the performance gap between junior and senior physicians. MedOS transforms clinical intervention towards a collaborative discipline where human intuition and machine intelligence co-evolve.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic mapping of multiplexed social receptive fields by deep learning and GPU-accelerated 3D videography 94%
- PHARAOH: A collaborative crowdsourcing platform for PHenotyping And Regional Analysis Of Histology 93%
- Large-scale capture of hidden fluorescent labels for training generalizable markerless motion capture models 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Utilise Unstructured Clinical Data for Acceleration of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Research 90%
- Multimodal surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 at a university enables development of a robust outbreak response framework 89%
- SalivaDirect: A simplified and flexible platform to enhance SARS-CoV-2 testing capacity 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.