Back

A Novel Deep Learning Model, Rdbcycylegan-Cbam For Low-Dose CT Image Denoising

Assaf, O.; Guvenis, A.

2026-02-18 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.17.706311 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computed Tomography (CT) is one of the largest contributors to radiation exposure from medical imaging, which can induce DNA damage and increase cancer risk. Reducing CT radiation dose to improve patient safety inherently increases image noise and artifacts. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have shown promise for unsupervised low-dose CT (LDCT) denoising. Building on this, RDBCycleGAN-CBAM, a CycleGAN-based model that integrates residual dense blocks (RDBs) and convolutional block attention modules (CBAM), was developed to effectively denoise quarter-dose CT images while preserving structural detail. The model was trained on unpaired quarter-dose and full-dose CT scans from the NIH-AAPM-Mayo dataset using adversarial (LSGAN), cycle-consistency, and identity losses. Evaluation on held-out test slices was performed using PSNR and SSIM as the primary image-quality metrics. The results demonstrate that the proposed RDBCycleGAN-CBAM method not only achieves higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) values but also outperforms most existing deep learning-based methods, achieving mean improvements of +3.97 dB in PSNR and +0.053 in SSIM relative to quarter-dose inputs. Shapiro- Wilk tests for PSNR and SSIM motivated the use of the nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test, by which highly significant improvements across both metrics (PSNR and SSIM) were demonstrated. The very large rank-biserial correlation values (1.0) indicate that nearly all test images experienced substantial quality improvement. Furthermore, the narrow bootstrap confidence intervals for the mean differences suggest that these improvements are consistent across the dataset. These advancements contribute to medical imaging by providing a viable, vendor-neutral tool for reducing patient radiation exposure without compromising diagnostic value.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
7
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
11
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
13
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
16
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
22
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
27
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%