Ed-Triage-Agent: A Framework For Human-Ai Collaborative Emergency Triage
Sharma, K.; Sivadas, H.; Reddy, S.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWEmergency Department triage is a critical decision-making process in which clinicians must rapidly assess patient acuity under high cognitive load and time pressure. We present ED-Triage-Agent (ETA), a multi-agent AI framework designed to augment clinical decision-making in Emergency Severity Index (ESI) classification through human-AI collaboration. The system operates in two phases: (1) autonomous patient intake via a conversational agent that collects structured symptom histories and (2) collaborative acuity assessment in which specialized agents prioritize patients for vital sign collection and generate ESI classifications with explicit clinical reasoning. Unlike monolithic AI prediction systems, ETA mirrors clinical workflow by supporting decisions at each triage stage while preserving clinician autonomy. We describe the system architecture, agent design principles, and a preliminary evaluation methodology using the ESI Implementation Handbook case studies (60 standardized cases). This work proposes a model for deploying multi-agent AI systems in time-critical clinical environments where explainability and human oversight are essential. Code and the evaluation framework are available at https://github.com/Karthick47v2/ED-Triage-Agent.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating large language model workflows in clinical decision support: referral, triage, and diagnosis 96%
- Development and Prospective Implementation of a Large Language Model based System for Early Sepsis Prediction 95%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
- The performance of national COVID-19 ‘Symptom Checkers’: A comparative case simulation study 92%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of ‘Patient Optimizer’ (POP) Algorithms for Predicting Surgical Risk with Machine Learning 93%
- An Interpretable Risk Prediction Model for Healthcare with Pattern Attention 92%
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.