Repeated histological diagnoses and kidney graft failure: an observational cohort study

BackgroundThe effects of Banff histological diagnoses on kidney transplant outcome have been well characterized. However, repeated observation of such histological injury across multiple biopsies in kidney transplant recipients remains insufficiently explored. MethodsIn an observational cohort (N=1819 transplantations with 5736 post-transplant biopsies, recurrent event survival models quantified transitions between diagnoses of T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), DSA-negative C4d-negative microvascular inflammation (MVIDSA-/C4d-), BK polyomavirus nephropathy (BKPyVAN), borderline TCMR (bTCMR), and probable AMR (pAMR), revealing patterns in the disease trajectories. In two observational cohorts (N=1818 transplantations with 5732 biopsies, N=853 transplantations with 975 biopsies), time-dependent cumulative covariates were constructed for TCMR, AMR, MVIDSA-/C4d- and BKPyVAN, enabling estimation of associations of repeated diagnoses with graft failure using multivariable cause-specific Cox models. ResultsThe incidence rate of a diagnosis was most strongly associated with earlier diagnosis of the same type, but associations between different types of diagnoses also occurred. The hazard of kidney graft failure was significantly increased by repeated observation of TCMR in multiple biopsies (HR 7.97, 95% CI 4.94 - 12.86), as well as by repeated AMR (HR 6.19, 95% CI 3.15 - 12.17), repeated MVIDSA-/C4d- (HR 4.53, 95% CI 2.15-9.54) and repeated BKPyVAN (HR 10.90, 95% CI 5.83 - 20.35). The hazard of graft failure was increased more after repeated diagnoses in transplants than after first diagnoses. The effects of repeated TCMR and repeated AMR remained significant even when observed in protocol biopsies in the absence of graft dysfunction. Repeated observation of BKPyVAN was the most detrimental of all diagnoses when observed in indication biopsies, but it was the least harmful when observed in protocol biopsies. ConclusionIncidence of Banff histological diagnoses appears to be affected by earlier diagnoses, especially those of the same type. These repeated observations of a specific diagnosis have an additional effect on the hazard of graft failure, underscoring a critical unmet need for adequate treatment strategies for these recurrent or persistent injury processes. Lay summaryIn two observational cohorts of 1819 and 750 kidney transplant recipients, kidney transplant biopsies were taken at multiple time points after transplantation. Based on the Banff classification for transplant pathology, various post-transplant diseases were diagnosed, often at more than one time point during follow-up. We assessed patterns in the occurrence of diagnoses over time, and related these diagnoses to survival of the kidney grafts using survival models with time-dependent cumulative diagnoses. We found that repeated observation of the same diagnosis was much more common than consecutive observations of different diagnoses. Repeated diagnoses of tissue injury also decreased kidney graft survival more compared to single diagnoses. This indicates that treatment options for patients with repeated or persistent diagnoses are currently inadequate and novel strategies are needed.