Back

Anatolution, an online platform for consensus morphology

Miller, D. J.; Gratton, B.; LeBlanc, Z.; Kaas, J. H.

2026-02-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.16.706144 bioRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionSupervised statistical learning for cell-level segmentation and morphometry in optical microscopy is limited less by algorithmic capacity than by the scarcity of reliable, expert-validated ground truth. In comparative neuroscience and quantitative histology, where classical stains such as Nissls method remain the primary means to study cellular morphology, this bottleneck is acute: manual annotation is expensive, subject to individual bias, and rarely performed at the scale or consistency that computational approaches demand. No existing platform integrates a stain-specific bioimage segmentation protocol, a structured multi-annotator workflow, and consensus-based quality control into a single pipeline from image ingestion to machine-readable training data. MethodsWe present Anatolution, an open-source, web-based platform designed to address the gap of quality annotations at https://anatolution.herokuapp.com/public-tool/. Anatolution organizes microscopy images, including 2D arrays or 3D volumes, into project workspaces where multiple annotators independently label cellular structures against a shared computer vision catalogue. This design enables systematic inter-rater and intra-rater reliability assessment, with consensus derived from agreement across annotators rather than from any single experts judgment. The platform enables the export of aggregated labels or annotation datasets for downstream statistical learning methods. We describe the systems architecture, its Nissl-specific segmentation pipeline, the consensus annotation workflow, and validation of inter-rater reliability. ConclusionAcross 20+ histological annotation containers annotated by up to 15 independent raters, consensus boundary agreement increased monotonically with annotator count, reaching a median Dice of 0.79 against the full-rater reference at seven annotators, with top-tier containers achieving leave-one-out ceiling values of 0.621-0.769 for cell-body segmentation. The segmentation pipeline provided effective spatial anchoring, with 88% of consensus-annotated polygons containing at least one algorithmically detected seed. Anatolution provides open-source infrastructure for producing consensus-validated training data from classical histological preparations, addressing the primary bottleneck limiting supervised learning for cell-level morphometry.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
2
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
3
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.0%
7
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.6%
10
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
12
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
13
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Journal of Comparative Neurology
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
22
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.2%
24
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
26
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
27
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%