Back

Stopping and Changing Expected and Unexpected Movements

Weber, S.; Vucak, N.; Salomoni, S. E.; Ross, A. J.; Coleman, E.; Hinder, M. R.

2026-02-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.02.16.706101 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The capacity to cancel or adapt planned actions in response to changing environmental demands is essential for navigating our complex world. While past research has shown that an individuals expectations of upcoming movement demands influence the speed of action initiation, the effect this has on subsequent cancellation or adaption of that movement remains unknown. 25 healthy adults completed stop signal tasks and stop change tasks in which biasing cues (e.g., "70% left") accurately indicated the probability that a left, or right button press would be required. As expected, responses that were congruent with the cue were faster than incongruent responses; however, biasing cues had no effect on behavioural or physiological (electromyographical) indices of stopping speed. Stopping latencies were found to be faster in the stop change task than the stop signal task, corroborating other recent work. However, a second experiment (25 healthy adults) which used the same stimuli for both tasks (varying only the instructions), revealed no difference - highlighting the sensitivity of the stop process to stimulus effects, and a common confound in the literature. We also observed that physiological indices of action reprogramming (following a stop) were faster in congruent than incongruent trials. Collectively, these results suggests that preparatory changes that accompany expected movements influence the enaction of movement both prior to, and after stopping, but the stop mechanism itself, remains independent of these preparations. These results inform how action cancellation and adaption are applied in real world environments, where expectations continually interface with our motor plans. HighlightsO_LI* Anticipating a movement increases the speed of its enaction but not subsequent cancellation C_LIO_LI* Expected movements can be reprogrammed more quickly than unexpected movements C_LIO_LI* The latency of action cancellation is highly sensitive to stimulus effects C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
5
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
8
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
10
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.8%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.8%
13
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
18
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
21
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Behavioural Brain Research
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
26
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
27
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%