Back

Tuning selectivity of electrochemical sensors with polymer coatings

Weber, I. C.; Zosso, Y.; Patino, D. U.; Rijns, L.; Duesselberg, A.; Bao, Z.

2026-02-17 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.02.16.706066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electrochemical sensors are promising for health monitoring due to their high repeatability and sensitivity, particularly when nanostructured. Yet, their translation into real applications is hindered by limited selectivity in the absence of specific binding receptors: many biomarkers exhibit similar oxidation potentials, producing overlapping voltammetric signals that impede molecular discrimination. Here, we demonstrate that the oxidation potential of several small molecule biomarkers can be controlled through polymeric coatings, specifically poly(4-vinylpyridine), deposited onto glassy carbon electrodes. The polymer coating alters diffusion and adsorption characteristics, which ultimately lead to oxidation potential shifts of ascorbic acid and serotonin, enabling their separation of otherwise overlapping signals. These findings are supported by Chronocoulometry and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analysis that reveal changes in diffusion coefficient, adsorbed charge, and hydrogen bonding that are likely responsible for the altered sensor performance. These findings can be expanded to further polymers and biomarkers, including estradiol and melatonin. Finally, we demonstrate that the same selectivity trends persist on nanostructured, stretchable carbon-flower electrodes, where the high surface area further enhances sensitivity. Collectively, these findings reveal polymer-controlled peak-potential tuning as a powerful and broadly applicable route toward highly selective electrochemical sensors, enabling molecular discrimination in complex mixtures and opening new avenues for sensor-array-based detection.

Published in Advanced Materials (predicted rank #6) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.