Back

Quantitative Ultrasound Biomarkers of Testicular Spermatogenic Function

Kohn, T. P.; Coady, P. J.; Oppenheimer, A. G.; Walia, A.; Hernadez, B. S.; Kohn, J. R.; Parikh, N.; Bazzi, M.; Stocks, B.; Khera, M.; Lipshultz, L. I.

2026-02-17 urology
10.64898/2026.02.16.26346440 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionNon-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) represents the most severe form of male infertility. Current clinical tools have limited ability to predict sperm production or guide surgical sperm retrieval. Conventional B-mode ultrasound provides qualitative grayscale images and cannot characterize testicular microstructure relevant to spermatogenesis. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) provides objective parameters from raw radiofrequency data, which quantitatively measure tissue heterogeneity. We hypothesize that men with spermatogenesis will have different QUS features compared to men without spermatogenesis (measured by total motile count, TMC, on semen analysis), with the goal of identifying imaging biomarkers for prognosis and intraoperative guidance. MethodsWe prospectively analyzed men presenting for infertility evaluation who underwent high-frequency ultrasound imaging and semen analysis. Imaging was performed using a 36-MHz transducer with fixed acquisition parameters. Ninety-two QUS features were extracted from manually annotated testicular regions of interest, including Nakagami distribution parameters (m, {omega}, k), envelope statistics, and texture features. Univariate associations between each QUS feature and TMC were assessed using Spearman correlation with Bonferroni correction. Top-performing features were evaluated using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to discriminate sperm presence or absence (TMC>0 vs TMC=0). ResultsThirty-seven men (18 azoospermic, 19 with sperm present in the ejaculate) contributed 135 regions of interest. Seventeen of 92 QUS features significantly correlated with TMC after correction. The coefficient of variation of the Nakagami k-factor within the superficial testicular parenchyma (K_Zone1_Cv) demonstrated the strongest correlation ({rho}=0.51, corrected p<0.001), suggesting that greater spatial heterogeneity in the superficial parenchyma was associated with higher sperm counts. K_Zone1_Cv discriminated sperm presence with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.60-0.92), sensitivity 73.7%, and specificity 83.3%. QUS features with the highest univariate association were highly intercorrelated, suggesting a shared biological signal. ConclusionQuantitative ultrasound-derived measures of testicular microstructure heterogeneity correlate with sperm production and demonstrate moderate discrimination of sperm presence. These findings suggest QUS may provide a non-invasive imaging biomarker of spermatogenesis. Study findings warrant further assessment and validation in male infertility for sperm retrieval prognosis and the potential for intra-operative surgical guidance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Reproduction
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
5
Molecular Human Reproduction
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
7
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
8
Biology of Reproduction
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
16
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
17
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
19
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%