Acute myocardial infarction releases more troponin per unit of late gadolinium enhancement mass compared to acute myocarditis
Rajamohan, M.; Dind, A.; Ugander, M.; Figtree, G. A.; Kozor, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundBoth acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute myocarditis are characterised by cardiac troponin release as a marker of cardiomyocyte injury. While peak troponin is widely accepted as a surrogate marker for infarct size in AMI, its relationship with myocardial injury in acute myocarditis is unclear. This study aimed to quantify and compare the association between peak high-sensitivity cardiac troponin and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) extent in patients with AMI versus acute myocarditis. MethodsPatients undergoing CMR imaging and measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I during hospital admission were retrospectively included. LGE extent was quantified in grams using the semi-automated expectation-maximization weighted intensity algorithm (EWA). ResultsCompared to patients with acute myocarditis (n=47), patients with AMI (n=49) had higher peak troponin levels (median [interquartile range] 32,470 [3,109-104,699] vs 7,295 [1,857-22,550] ng/L, p=0.002), larger LGE extent (25 [13-56] vs 10 [6-17] g, p<0.001), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45 [36- 52] vs 55 [49-58] %, p<0.001). Peak troponin was moderately positively correlated with LGE extent in both AMI (rho=0.56, p<0.001) and acute myocarditis (rho=0.58, p<0.001). However, the ratio of peak troponin to LGE mass was higher in AMI compared to acute myocarditis (1,299 [419-3233] vs 909 [310-1446] ng/L/g, p=0.02). ConclusionsPeak cardiac troponin correlates positively with LGE extent in both AMI and acute myocarditis, but the magnitude of LGE and LV systolic dysfunction is greater in AMI. Also, AMI typically has an approximately 40% greater amount of troponin release per unit LGE mass compared to acute myocarditis. This suggest that troponin-based estimates of myocardial injury size estimated by LGE are not directly interchangeable between ischaemic and inflammatory myocardial diseases.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of compact myocardial thinning in patients with left ventricular non-compaction 97%
- Investigating Electrocardiographic Abnormalities in Patients with Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction 96%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of the Impact of Procedural and Pharmacological Interventions on Deep Learning-based Electrocardiographic Markers of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessment of cardiovascular & pulmonary pathobiology in vivo during acute COVID-19 95%
- Relationship of mild to moderate impairment of left ventricular ejection fraction with fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in cardiac sarcoidosis 94%
- Fabry Cardiomyopathy: Myocardial Fibrosis, Inflammation and Down-Regulation of Mannose-6-Phosphate Receptors cause Low accessibility to Enzyme Replacement Therapy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Reduced stress perfusion in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries 98%
- Improved evaluation of left ventricular hypertrophy using the spatial QRS-T angle by electrocardiography 97%
- Left ventricular mass and global wall thickness – prognostic utility and characterization of left ventricular hypertrophy 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of low versus high inspired oxygen fraction on myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A randomized clinical trial 94%
- Predictors and outcomes of Cardiac Dyssynchrony among patients with heart failure attending Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma, central Tanzania: A protocol of prospective-longitudinal study 94%
- Echocardiographic characterization and markers of cardiovascular risk in adults with sickle cell disease in a Colombian tertiary referral centre: a cross-sectional study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.