Perfusionist nursing as a key element in organ preservation and viability in uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) after failed ECPR: experience and outcomes of transplanted organs

ObjectiveTo analyze the experience of the last six years with ECMO in Uncontrolled Donation after Circulatory Death (uDCD), assessing the clinical and logistical factors that determine donation effectiveness and the viability of retrieved organs, with the nurse perfusionist as the central figure in organ perfusion. MethodsRetrospective observational study of uDCD procedures performed at Hospital Clinic de Barcelona between June 2019 and October 2025. ResultsOf 184 out-of-hospital ECMO-CPR activations, 108 (58.7%) underwent perfusion; 72 donor cases (66.7%) were generated, and 109 kidneys (75.7%) and 3 livers (4.15%) were retrieved. The annual number of uDCD donors was heterogeneous. Compared with non-effective donors, effective donors were significantly younger (48.1 {+/-} 12.4 vs 53.0 {+/-} 10.7 years, p=0.03) and had fewer comorbidities such as hypertension (13.8% vs 33.0%, p=0.018) and diabetes (4.1% vs 16.6%, p=0.027). Although effective donors had a shorter cannulation time (25.6 {+/-} 13.9 vs 29.1 {+/-} 11.9 min, p=0.09), the difference was not statistically significant; however, cardiocompressor time did show a significant difference (58.9 {+/-} 17.7 vs 65.8 {+/-} 18.2 min, p=0.03). ConclusionsuDCD was a useful source of transplantable organs, mainly kidneys (two out of every three perfused patients became donors), in the current context of scarcity of brain-dead donors. Shorter warm ischemia times (cardiocompressor and cannulation times) were significantly associated with more effective organ donation. The multidisciplinary transplant team may benefit from perfusion professionals with expertise in extracorporeal oxygenation therapy.