Development And Validation Of The Sri Lankan Primary Care Assessment Tool (Sl-Pcat) For Evaluating Patients' Experiences In Primary Care
Abeyrathna, P.; Agampodi, S. B.; Samaranayake, S.; Pushpakumara, P. H. G. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis study developed and validated a primary care assessment tool (SL-PCAT) for evaluating patients experiences in the Sri Lankan healthcare setting. MethodsThe study was conducted from April 2021 to August 2023 inside a medical faculty and selected communities in the Anuradhapura District. The tool was validated through item development, scale development, and scale evaluation processes. Items were selected through focused-group interviews, a literature review, and an expert review. Two language experts translated the tool into the Sinhala language. The scales construct was evaluated parallel to a cross-sectional household survey in 32 villages. First, 633 valid data were randomly split into two groups (Subsample-1 [n=320] and Subsample-2 [n=313]). Exploratory factor analysis was performed in Subsample-1 with principal component analysis (PCA), followed by reliability assessment with Cronbachs alpha. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on Subsample-2. Likert scale assumption testing and descriptive statistics were performed in the final factor structure. ResultsThe four factor solution from PCA explained 66.8% variance in data. Domains identified were contextual care at family and community with continuity, accessibility, patient-centred care, and comprehensive and coordinated care. The domains reported Cronbachs alpha values between 0.719 and 0.859. The goodness of fit index of the CFA improved after allowing a few modifications (X2=199, p<0.001, RMSEA= 0.079, GFI=0.916, SRMR=0.066, CFI=0.916). The corresponding convergent and discriminant validity of the Likert scale assumptions was optimum, with Item-scale correlations between 0.346 and 0.830 and scaling success rates over 70%. Three domains, except contextual care at family and community with continuity, reported positively skewed scores, indicating more positive responses. ConclusionsSL-PCAT is a feasible, valid, and reliable tool for assessing patients experiences of primary care in Sri Lanka.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 96%
- Community-based newborn care intervention fidelity and its implementation drivers in South Wollo Zone, North-east Ethiopia 95%
- Factors influencing the motivation of maternal health workers in conflict setting of Mogadishu, Somalia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 95%
- A conceptual model for pluralistic healthcare behavior: results from a qualitative study in southwestern Uganda 95%
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Caregivers’ Perspective: Satisfaction With Healthcare Services At The Paediatric Specialist Clinic Of The National Referral Centre In Malaysia 95%
- Determinants of Periodic Health Examination Uptake: Insights from a Jordanian Cross-Sectional Study 95%
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health literacy profiles correlate with participation in primary health care among patients with chronic diseases: A latent profile analysis 96%
- Digital Health Interventions and Quality of Home-based Primary Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 94%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.