Back

Survey shows limited awareness of tamoxifen-associated uterine cancer risk among breast cancer survivors

Ellinger, Y.; Annaldasula, S.; Stockschläder, L.; Rudlowski, C.; Besserer, A.; Zivanovic, O.; Kaiser, C.; Park-Simon, T.-W.; Blohmer, J.-U.; Armann, R.; Kübler, K.

2026-02-17 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.16.26346375 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundTamoxifen is a cornerstone of endocrine treatment for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, reducing recurrence and breast cancer-specific mortality. However, its use is associated with a small, yet clinically relevant, increase in uterine cancer. As diagnosis of this cancer remains symptom-triggered, it is essential for patients to be aware of this risk and report symptoms promptly for optimal outcomes. We therefore assessed risk awareness among breast cancer survivors while exploring their attitudes towards potential future endometrial surveillance strategies. MethodsOver a 10-month period, a web-based survey was conducted among breast cancer survivors with/without tamoxifen treatment. The mixed-format questionnaire included closed-ended questions and optional free-text comments. Quantitative data were summarized descriptively and analyzed statistically; qualitative responses were reviewed thematically to contextualize survey findings. ResultsOf 163 respondents, 154 breast cancer survivors were included in the analysis, 128 of whom had received tamoxifen. Among tamoxifen-associated participants, 60% reported insufficient awareness of the associated uterine cancer risk, and half expressed uncertainty about the adequacy of the current symptom-triggered endometrial evaluation. Despite this, acceptance of tamoxifen therapy was high; only one patient declined treatment over concerns about side effects. Almost all participants (96%) were willing to adopt endometrial surveillance methods, if developed and validated. ConclusionAs evaluation of tamoxifen-associated uterine pathology is symptom-triggered, our data highlight the need for improved and standardized risk communication to promote timely symptom recognition, reporting, and diagnostic evaluation. Moreover, our findings support incorporating patient-reported preferences into the development of future endometrial detection strategies to improve survivorship care.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.1%
2
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
8.2%
4
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
5
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
8
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
10
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
12
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
14
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
20
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%