Back

Estimating the Smallest Worthwhile Difference (SWD) of Psychotherapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey

Sahker, E.; Lu, I.; Eddie, D.; So, R.; Luo, Y.; Omae, K.; Tajika, A.; Angelo, J. P.; Crisp, T.; Coffin, B.; Furukawa, T. A.

2026-02-27 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.02.16.26346220 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPsychotherapy is proven efficacious for the treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, the patient-perceived importance of its effect is not fully appreciated in the evidence base. The smallest worthwhile difference (SWD) represents the smallest beneficial effect of an intervention that patients deem worthwhile in exchange for the harms, expenses, and inconveniences associated with the intervention, and facilitates the interpretation of patient perceived worthiness of an intervention. MethodsThe proposed study will estimate the SWD of NIAAA recommended psychotherapies for AUD treatment with English-speaking American respondents aged 18 and older. Primary participants will be recruited using the Prolific research crowdsourcing site. The SWD will be estimated using the Benefit-Harm Trade-off Method, presenting survey respondents with variable, hypothetical magnitudes of psychotherapy outcomes to find the smallest acceptable effect over a natural remission alternative. The overall average SWD, and subgroup distributions by participant AUD treatment experiences and AUD symptomology will be described. Secondary findings will estimate the smallest recommendable risk difference for AUD psychotherapy from providers and criminal justice professionals. Expected ResultsWe expect to find an estimate of the SWD for AUD psychotherapy. Further, we expect that the SWD will vary between clinical subgroups based on AUD symptomology and treatment experiences. We expect differences in SWDs between the general population and those of providers and criminal justice professionals. Findings from this project will inform the treatment decision process about psychotherapy during the clinical consultation for people with AUD.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.0%
4
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.8%
6
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
7
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
International Journal of Drug Policy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Statistics in Medicine
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Addiction Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
16
Alcohol
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
21
Psychopharmacology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%