Back

Occupational and Environmental Challenges and Effects of COVID-19 Testing Implementation Experienced by HIV Viral Load Laboratory Staff within a Public Health Sector Laboratory in South Africa

Sarang, S.; Matingo-Mutava, E.; Cassim, N.

2026-02-22 occupational and environmental health
10.64898/2026.02.16.26346134 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic required South African public sector HIV viral load (VL) laboratories to scale up Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing while maintaining essential HIV services. This placed additional pressure on diagnostic services. This dual mandate introduced significant occupational and environmental challenges (OEC) for staff that remain underexplored. ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the OEC and effects that staff experienced during the implementation of COVID-19 testing at public sector VL laboratories in South Africa. MethodsA quantitative, cross-sectional study utilised a census approach among technical and support staff. Data were collected via a structured REDCap questionnaire using 5-point Likert scales. Pre- and post-implementation challenges were assessed across four domains: workload, environmental conditions (space, ventilation, waste), communication, and PPE availability. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank and Spearmans correlation tests. ResultsPerceived occupational challenges increased significantly across all domains post-implementation. Staff workload saw the highest rise (mean score 3.02 to 3.53). Adverse health effects were pervasive; 80.2% of staff reported burnout/fatigue, and 76.5% reported increased anxiety/stress. A strong positive correlation was observed between post-COVID-19 challenges and adverse mental and physical health outcomes (rho = 0.449, p < 0.001). Furthermore, 35.8% of staff considered resigning due to increased job demands. ConclusionIntegrating COVID-19 testing exacerbated systemic weaknesses, causing measurable psychological injury and threatening workforce retention. Findings suggest that the diagnostic workforce requires formal crisis surge staffing models and institutionalised mental health support to safeguard personnel and maintain essential services during future health emergencies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.3%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
4
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
10
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
17
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
American Journal of Infection Control
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%