Unmet palliative care needs in England and Wales: population-based estimates and future projections (2025-2050)
Johansson, T.; Sleeman, K. E.; Finucane, A.; Davies, J. M.; Fraser, L. K.; Higginson, I. J.; Diggle, M. F. J.; Murtagh, F. E. M.; Bone, A. E.
Show abstract
IntroductionWith global populations ageing, demand for palliative care is increasing. Population-level assessments of unmet palliative care needs are essential for strategic planning, yet rigorous methods to estimate unmet needs are lacking. This study aimed to develop methods and estimate current and future population-level prevalence of unmet palliative care needs among adults in England and Wales. MethodsSecondary analyses of data from a nationally representative post-bereavement survey in England and Wales in 2022 (n=1,194). Unmet needs in the survey sample were estimated using two methods: (1) reported unresolved symptoms and concerns using Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale scores, cutoff [≥]34/68; and (2) reported insufficient care provision from general practitioners. These methods were combined to further provide a conservative estimate (1 and 2) and a broad estimate (1 or 2). We examined associations with unmet needs using modified Poisson regression. Age-, gender- and nation-specific sample estimates were applied to mortality data for 2022 and projections from the Office for National Statistics to calculate population-level estimates and prevalence from 2025 to 2050. ResultsIn 2022, 247,993 (46%) adult decedents in England and 17,209 (49%) in Wales had unmet palliative care needs using method 1; 244,612 (46%) and 15,280 (43%), respectively, using method 2. According to conversative and broad estimates, 32% and 61% could have unmet needs in England, and 29% and 62% in Wales. By 2050, prevalence of unmet needs are projected to rise by 21-26% in England and 14-19% in Wales depending on estimate used, with the largest absolute increase among those aged [≥]85 years. ConclusionsUnmet palliative care needs are high in England and Wales and projected to increase by 2050, regardless of method. We contrast methods based on unresolved symptoms and concerns or insufficient care provision, or both, to inform the planning and evaluating of equitable care. Key MessagesO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topicC_ST_ABSO_LIAlthough understanding population-level unmet palliative care needs is critical for effective service planning, robust and standardised methods to estimate these needs remain limited. C_LI What this study addsO_LIWe use two methods to provide four estimates of population-level prevalence of unmet palliative care needs and discuss their strengths and limitations. C_LIO_LIRegardless of estimate, prevalence of unmet palliative care needs is high, ranging 32-61% in England and in 29-62% in Wales; the number of people with unmet needs is anticipated to increase by 21-26% in England and 14-19% in Wales by 2050. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIThis advancement in methods to estimate unmet palliative care needs can inform the development and evaluation of population-level strategies to improve end-of-life care. C_LIO_LIOur population-level estimates do not account for multiple long-term conditions which are rising and will likely increase the complexity of needs. C_LIO_LIThere needs to be more investment in primary and community-based services to ensure high-quality symptom management and support for people and their families towards the end of life. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Which outcomes should be included in a core outcome set for capturing and measuring doctor well-being? A Delphi study 92%
- Trends in inequalities in avoidable hospitalisations across the COVID-19 pandemic: A cohort study of 23.5 million people in England 92%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 96%
- Place, cause and expectedness of death and relationship to the deceased are associated with poorer experiences of end-of-life care and challenges in early bereavement: Risk factors from an online survey of people bereaved during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care 92%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 92%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socio-demographic inequalities in COVID-19 health care access and experiences in the United Kingdom: intersectional and mixed-methods analyses of open and closed questions in a prospective cohort study 91%
- Understanding the clinical characteristics and timeliness of diagnosis for patients diagnosed with Long COVID: A retrospective observational cohort study from North West London 90%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Maximising pain services for frail older adults, the views of healthcare professionals and commissioners: findings from the Pain in Older People with Frailty (POPPY) study. 91%
- Caregivers’ burden of care during emergency department care transitions among older adults: a mixed methods cohort study 90%
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.