Back

A novel pharmacogenetic testing panel for CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms

Enwere, M.; Turiello, R.; Foo, J.; Nouwairi, R.; McElroy, J. H.; Medearis, E.; Smith, D.; Laurell, N.; Clayton, A.; Yarlagadda, A.; Aitchison, K.; Venton, B. J.; Landers, J. P.

2026-02-17 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2026.02.14.705357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Specific drug metabolism rates are defined by the constituency of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genome, including polymorphic changes in any of 200+ CYP genes. An example is CYP2C19, where associations of gene polymorphisms with variability in certain drug metabolism rates have been linked to inter-individual and inter-ethnic differences in therapeutic outcomes. While pharmacogenomic screening for these variants prior to drug and dosage prescription has well-defined links to better treatment outcomes, current implementation is limited to complex and costly variant-probing and DNA sequencing protocols, which have limited availability in clinical laboratories, leading to slow turnaround times, impacting effective clinical intervention. Here we describe a novel, cost-effective, multiplex genotyping approach to screening CYP2C19 variants. Fluorescence nested allele-specific (FAS) PCR was used with primers to detect CYP2C19 variants of interest in specific hot spots, including the Tier 1 haplotypes identified by the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP): CYP2C19*2, *3, and *17. The presence/absence of wild-type and mutant alleles were identified independently as haplotypes, and in a multiplex reaction as diplotypes representing the 10 possible genotype combinations/profiles. FAS-PCR achieved the same genotype calls as a pyrosequencing protocol optimized for validating genotypes, but with a simpler and more sensitive interface. The FAS-PCR method correctly identified the genotypes of both synthesized DNA and a human genomic DNA standard. Uniquely, the FAS-PCR protocol generates patterns using one fluorescently-labeled primer irrespective of the number of variants targeted, establishing it as considerably more cost-effective than other allele-specific PCR-based techniques that involve labeling both the forward and reverse primers.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
18.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
6
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
8
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
9
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
19
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
70 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
24
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
30
Oncotarget
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%