Back

Joint Learning of Drug-Drug Combination and Drug-DrugInteraction via Coupled Tensor-Tensor Factorization with SideInformation

Zhang, X.; Fang, Z.; Tang, K.; Chen, H.; Li, J.

2026-02-16 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.02.13.705792 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeted drug therapies offer a promising approach for treating complex diseases, with combinational drug therapies often employed to enhance therapeutic efficacy. However, unintended drug-drug interactions may undermine treatment outcomes or cause adverse side effects. In this work, we propose a novel joint learning framework for the simultaneous prediction of effective drug combinations and drug-drug interactions, based on coupled tensor-tensor factorization. Specifically, we model drug combination therapies and DDI by representing drug-drug-disease associations and drug-drug interaction profiles as coupled three-way tensors. To address the challenges of data incompleteness and sparsity, the proposed model integrates auxiliary drug similarity information, such as chemical structure similarities, drug-specific side effects, drug target profiles, and drug inhibition data on cancer cell lines, within a multi-view learning frame-work. For optimization, we adopt a modified Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) algorithm that ensures convergence while enforcing non-negativity constraints. In addition to standard tensor completion tasks, we further evaluate the proposed method under a more realistic new-drug prediction setting, where all interactions involving a previously unseen drug are withheld. This scenario closely aligns with real-world applications, in which reliable predictions for emerging or under-studied compounds are essential. We evaluate the proposed method on a comprehensive dataset compiled from multiple sources, including DrugBank, CDCDB, SIDER, and PubChem. Our experiments show that SI-ADMM maintains robust performance and achieves the best results comparing to other tensor factorization approaches, with or without auxiliary information, particularly in the new-drug prediction setting. The implementation of our method is publicly available at: https://github.com/Xiaoge-Zhang/SI-ADMM.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.3%
2
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.6%
3
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
6
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.4%
7
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.6%
10
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
171 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.8%
12
Science Bulletin
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
16
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
19
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
21
Quantitative Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Patterns
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
25
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Journal of Cheminformatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%