Back

Cluster-randomized Trial of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills Program Compared to Treatment as Usual/Waitlist for Youth Ages 11-14: Study Protocol for Conceptual Replication

Nissley-Tsiopinis, J.; Fleming, P. J.; Chan, W. J.; Langberg, J. M.; Cacia, J. J.; Vigil, T. J.; Chamberlin, B.; DiBartolo, C. A.; Tremont, K. L.; Walz, E. H.; Jawad, A. F.; Mautone, J. A.; Power, T. J.

2026-02-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346294 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOrganization, time management, and planning (OTMP) difficulties are associated with academic underachievement. OTMP skills training programs are effective in reducing OTMP deficits and improving academic performance. A randomized controlled trial of Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) for students ages 11-14 (1) found it to be effective with medium to large effects. In that study, HOPS was provided by counselors employed by the research team. This study is a replication examining HOPS under more authentic conditions when providers are employed by schools serving enrolled students. The primary aim is to evaluate HOPS offered by school providers in relation to treatment-as-usual/waitlist (TAU/WL). To respond to limited school resources post-COVID-19, HOPS is also provided by research team members, creating the opportunity to replicate the findings from the prior trial (1) and explore differential effectiveness when HOPS is implemented by school vs. research providers. MethodsStudents in about 30 schools serving students ages 11-14 will be enrolled. Schools are randomly assigned to HOPS vs. TAU/WL on a 2:1 ratio. Students assigned to HOPS schools are randomly assigned to a school vs. research provider on a 1:1 basis. Providers receive two hours of training and additional assistance on request. Child outcomes related to OTMP skills, homework, and academic performance are assessed at post-treatment, 6-month (from baseline) follow-up, and 12-month follow-up. HOPS sessions are video recorded for fidelity coding. Potential effect modifiers include student ADHD, oppositional defiant, and internalizing symptoms, and family socioeconomic level. Analyses will use mixed effects modeling. The goal of the study is to enroll 135 participants, yielding a minimal detectable effect size of 0.50, within the expected range based on prior research. DiscussionThe study is unique in examining intervention implementation and effectiveness when intervention is provided under authentic practice conditions. Trial RegistrationThis study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04465708).

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.7%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
8
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.4%
14
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
23
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Autism Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
27
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
28
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
29
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%