Back

Perioperative diffuse optical imaging of blood flow distributions for porcine skin flap viability assessment

Rabienia Haratbar, S.; Hamedi, F.; Mohtasebi, M.; Chen, L.; Wong, L.; Yu, G.; Chen, L.

2026-02-17 surgery
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346288 medRxiv
Show abstract

SignificanceMastectomy skin flap necrosis remains a major complication in implant-based breast reconstruction due to inadequate tissue blood flow. Existing diagnostic technologies are limited by shallow depth sensitivity, dye-related risks, contact requirements, and an inability to continuously assess blood flow. AimThis study aimed to translate a noncontact, dye-free, depth-sensitive speckle contrast diffuse correlation tomography (scDCT) technique to a clinically relevant porcine skin flap model for assessing flap blood flow and viability. ApproachThe scDCT system was optimized to image blood flow over seven days in four porcine skin flaps including Sham (SH), Implant (IM), Half Necrosis (HN), and Full Necrosis (FN). Measurements were compared with indocyanine green angiography (ICG-A) as a reference standard. ResultsscDCT enabled longitudinal monitoring of flap blood flow, revealing significant flow differences among flap types and over time. FN flaps consistently exhibited the most severe flow impairment, while other flap types showed partial or complete recovery over time, distinguishing nonviable from viable tissue. scDCT measurements demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with ICG-A across time points. ConclusionsThe findings support scDCT as a promising perioperative imaging modality for improving flap necrosis risk stratification and surgical decision-making, with future work focused on large-scale validation and clinical translation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.8%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
4
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
8
Neurophotonics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
9
Photoacoustics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
15
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
20
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%