Back

AI Generated Stromal Biomarkers for DCIS Reccurence Prediction

McNeil, M.; Ramanathan, V.; Bassiouny, D.; Nofech-Mozes, S.; Rakovitch, E.; Martel, A. L.

2026-02-17 oncology
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346278 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough DCIS has a relatively low recurrence rate, many patients still receive adjuvant radiotherapy or endocrine therapy, raising concerns about overtreatment. Reliable biomarkers are therefore needed to predict an individual patients risk and guide treatment decisions. Recent studies suggest that the composition of the tumour-associated stroma (TAS) affects progression and outcome, highlighting TAS-derived biomarkers as promising candidates for further investigation. MethodsWe trained AI models for cell and tumour segmentation using whole slide digital pathology images acquired as part of a retrospective cohort study. We investigated the effects of cell density within both the tumour and the TAS to determine how they correlated with recurrence in the ipsilateral breast. ResultsWe found that the concentration of DCIS lesions on the slide and the density of mitotic figures inside the TAS region were significantly associated with recurrence risk. Additionally, we found some predictive value in the lymphocyte and red blood cell densities in different tumour regions. Stromal composition was shown to associate with recurrence risk, and density-based biomarkers were identified and used to cluster patients into phenotypes with significantly different risk profiles. ConclusionOur findings highlight the prognostic relevance of stromal composition in DCIS, and we identify novel density-based biomarkers that can be used to identify patients who are more likely to experience a local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery alone. These results may aid in developing future risk-stratification tools for breast cancer patients, thereby reducing overtreatment and improving patient care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.2%
2
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.5%
4
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
7
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
13
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
The Journal of Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
27
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
28
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%