Back

Global Levels and Trends in Child Discipline: Evidence from 88 Countries, 2005-2023

Egyir, J.; De Cao, E.; Thomas, K.; Aurino, E.

2026-02-16 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346262 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHome disciplinary practices shape childrens health and development. Yet, comprehensive, up-to-date global evidence on their levels, trends, and socioeconomic and regional inequalities remains limited. This study provides the first global prevalence estimates of both violent and non-violent forms of discipline, examining regional disparities, variations by child and family characteristics, and changes over time. MethodsWe drew from 176 nationally-representative Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys and Demographic and Health Surveys, collected between 2005 and 2023 across 83 low- and middle-income and 5 high-income countries (N= 1,544,000 1-14y-olds). We estimated weighted prevalence estimates for all types of discipline (exclusively or only non-violent, physical and severe physical punishment, emotional violence, exclusively or only physical punishment, exclusively or only emotional violence, both physical and emotional violence). Disparities by child age, sex, residence, maternal education, household wealth, and world regions were computed. We also assessed changes over time for countries with multiple surveys. ResultsOnly 19.1% of children experienced exclusively non-violent discipline; 55.0% and 12.7% physical and severe physical punishment; and 64.0% emotional violence. Violent discipline was highest among 6-9y-olds, in Sub-Saharan Africa, and in poorer households. Sex differences were more limited. Use of only non-violent discipline slightly increased in 26 countries, while physical and emotional violence decreased in 33 and 31 countries, respectively. Yet, in some countries, violent discipline increased over time. ConclusionsDespite policy efforts to increase its use, exclusive non-violent discipline remains low, and violent methods are widespread. Targeted and context-specific interventions for specific age groups and poorer households curb violence exposure at home.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.3%
3
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
4
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.1%
5
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.2%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
11
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
13
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
JAMA Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
18
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
23
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%