Back

Sickness presenteeism due to respiratory infection in the English workforce: prevalence estimates and demographic factors from the Winter COVID-19 Infection Study (WCIS)

Burdon, M. G.; Denson, S.; Tang, M.; Mellor, J.; Ward, T.

2026-02-16 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.13.26346245 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWorking while sick (presenteeism) with an infectious disease contributes to the spread of infections and is detrimental to productivity. Respiratory illnesses are a common cause of sickness in the working population and understanding the prevalence of presenteeism linked to respiratory illness is therefore important. MethodsWinter Covid Infection Study (WCIS) panel members in work aged 18-64 were surveyed in February - March 2024 and asked about presenteeism in the previous 28 days. Multilevel regression and poststratification was used to estimate the prevalence and length of presenteeism and its effect on productivity in the English workforce, as approximated using the WCIS survey sample calibrated to census proportions. Differences by demographic groups and work sector were also analysed. ResultsAround one in six working adults in England worked while sick with a respiratory infection during the study period, and one in ten attended a non-home workplace. Overall, around one day per adult was spent working while sick with a respiratory infection, approximately half of which was non-home working. Respondents felt they were able to work at around three-quarters of their usual capacity while sick. Presenteeism was more common among respondents who were younger, White, worked in a hybrid pattern, lived in larger households, had Long COVID-19, or worked in teaching and education. ConclusionWorking while sick with a respiratory infection is relatively common, including among those who primarily work away from the home. Key messagesAround one in six working-age adults in employment worked while sick with a respiratory infection during the study period (Feb-Mar 2024). - The likelihood of working while sick with a respiratory infection varied by demographic group and work sector. - On average, survey respondents said they could work at around three quarters their normal effectiveness while sick with a respiratory infection.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
17.5%
2
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
6
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
15
Public Health in Practice
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
18
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Epidemics
104 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
24
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%