Improving cardiovascular population risk in primary care: protocol for the PROSPERA cluster-randomized controlled trial of a complex multilevel intervention
Bongaerts, V. A. M. C.; Vos, R. C.; Hageman, S. H. J.; Redekop, W. K.; Dorresteijn, J. A. N.; Numans, M. E.; van Os, H. J. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe growing burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threatens the sustainability of our healthcare systems. In the Netherlands, two-thirds of CVD-related healthcare is delivered in primary care practices, primarily by practice nurses. Given the increasing staffing shortages and the substantial heterogeneity of the population of primary care patients at increased risk of CVD, cardiovascular risk management strategies should be better tailored to individual patients needs and risk profiles. Therefore, we developed the PROSPERA program, aimed at the population of patients enrolled in integrated care programs for cardiovascular risk management in primary care. Methods and analysisThe PROSPERA study is a pragmatic 1:1 cluster randomized controlled trial in 22 primary care practices in the greater Leiden and the Hague region in The Netherlands, investigating real-world effectiveness of the PROSPERA program with care as usual. The PROSPERA program is a multilevel complex intervention, including a population-level risk stratification and three individual patient-level components: a healthcare professional training program in cardiovascular risk communication, a lifestyle questionnaire (Lifestylecheck), and a clinical decision support tool (U-Prevent). Patients between 40-90 years of age enrolled in integrated care programs for increased cardiovascular risk are included. The primary outcome is defined as successful achievement of all protocol-defined cardiovascular preventive treatment goals, measured as the difference between the proportion of patients who meet the outcome in the intervention versus the control group at 18 months. Secondary outcomes include implementation outcomes, healthcare professionals satisfaction on usability of the PROSPERA program, patient experience with shared decision making and decisional conflict, and outcomes on cost-effectiveness. Ethics and disseminationConsent for the use of routine healthcare data is obtained through an opt-out procedure for participating practices. Digital informed consent will be obtained for the study questionnaires for patients and healthcare professionals. Main findings on effectivity, efficacy and implementation will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and via (inter)national conferences. Trial registration numberNCT06593704 Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LIThe PROSPERA program was co-developed with stakeholders and refined via a preceding qualitative study, ensuring better integration with clinical workflows. C_LIO_LIThe pragmatic design of this study allows for broad inclusion at the level of the population at increased risk of CVD, enhancing representativeness and inclusivity. C_LIO_LIUse of the Extramural Leiden Medical Center Academic Network (ELAN) data infrastructure enables comprehensive collection of healthcare data. C_LIO_LIThe complexity of the current information- and technology (IT) infrastructure prototype is a constraint, but is expected to be simplified in the future. C_LIO_LIPotential cross-over contamination cannot be prevented, as control practices may have informal access to some PROSPERA components, although these are not yet widely implemented. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 93%
- The iHealth-T2D study: Statistical analysis plan for a cluster randomised controlled trial with intensive family-based lifestyle modification programme to reduce type 2 diabetes risk amongst South Asians 93%
- Rationale and design of the Learning Implementation of Guideline-based decision support system for Hypertension Treatment (LIGHT) Trial and LIGHT-ACD Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
- Real-world effects of ACE inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: protocol for an emulation study of the ONTARGET trial using electronic health records 94%
- The iDiabetes Platform: Enhanced Phenotyping of Patients with Diabetes for Precision Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment- study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping rehabilitation pathways after cardiac surgery: Identifying key points for patient involvement and gaps in care 94%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Multimodal Prehabilitation in People Awaiting Acute Inpatient Cardiac Surgery: Study Protocol for a Pilot Feasibility Trial (PreP-ACe) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Use of digital technology tools to examine patient adherence to a prescription omega-3 polyunsaturated acids therapy intended to mitigate cardiovascular risk: protocol and preliminary demographic data from the DIAPAsOn prospective observational study 94%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving cardiovascular health in patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm: Development of the Cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with aneurysms (CRISP) behaviour change intervention 96%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): A feasibility report of a pilot cluster randomised trial of prescribing policy in primary care to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.