Back

Sexual orientation inequalities in self-harm and suicidality in England and Wales - A national population-based study

Bunk, H.; Ayoubkhani, D.; Nafilyan, V.; Becares, L.; Curcin, V.; Khanolkar, A. R.; Sharland, E.

2026-02-17 public and global health
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346182 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSexual minority (SM) individuals have worse mental health than heterosexual peers. However, there is no total population-based and national-level evidence on differences in risk of self-harm and suicide by sexual orientation. This study provides the first national population-based estimates in England and Wales. MethodsUsing 2021 Census data linked with hospital records and death registrations, we analysed sexual orientation (SO) differences in: (i) at least one hospital inpatient admission/emergency attendance for intentional self-harm, and (ii) death by suicide. We calculated age-standardised rates per 100,000 people by SO between March 2021 and December 2023, and stratified by sociodemographic, geographical, socioeconomic and health-related variables. We calculated rate ratios for lesbian/gay/bisexual/other SO (LGB+) groups compared with heterosexuals to estimate sexual identity disparities. FindingsOur study population included 28.7 million people (mean age 48.1 years, 53.7% female, 84.2% White) aged [≥]16 years who self-reported their SO in Census 2021 and linked to an NHS number. LGB+ individuals had 2.52 (95% CI 2.48-2.56) times higher risk for self-harm and 2.17 (95% CI 1.98-2.37) times higher risk for suicide than heterosexual people. Relative risk of self-harm was highest for LGB+ females, younger adults, and Black individuals. Relative risk of suicide was highest for LGB+ females, older adults, and Black individuals. InterpretationThis study demonstrates stark inequalities in risk of self-harm and suicide by sexual orientation, consistent across multiple sociodemographic factors. These findings are important for informing government prevention programs and further mental health research. FundingThere was no external funding for this study. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before the studyC_ST_ABSThe substantial evidence on higher risk for self-harm and suicide in sexual minority groups in the UK (and wider Europe) is impacted by regional samples, younger populations, or surveys limited by smaller numbers precluding analyses by key sociodemographic factors (like sex, ethnic group, socioeconomic indicators, faith, housing situations and geographical indicators) or combining all sexual minority groups together. To date, no study has used total population-based data to examine sexual orientation inequalities in self-harm and suicide and in relation to a range of sociodemographic factors. Added value of this studyTo our knowledge, this is the first study in the UK to provide national population-based estimates of intentional self-harm and suicide by sexual orientation, including intersectional analyses across age, sex, ethnic group, and socioeconomic position. This study used a unique linkage between the census, hospital inpatient data, emergency care records and death registrations from across England and Wales, with a study population of 28.7 million people aged [≥]16 years who self-reported their sexual orientation in Census 2021 and linked to a National Health Service (NHS) number. Implications of all the available evidenceThis research provides national population-level evidence of substantial increased risk for self-harm and suicide among sexual minority individuals, compared with heterosexual individuals. This study also identified key groups of individuals at an increased risk of self-harm and suicide. These findings are important for informing government prevention programs and further research supporting the mental health of sexual minority groups.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
26.1%
2
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
3
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
4
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
6
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
8
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
15
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
16
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
30
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%