Back

Heterogeneity in deep brain stimulation gamma enhancement explained by bifurcations in neural dynamics

Biber, S. W.; Sermon, J. J.; Kaplan, J.; Busch, J.; Kühn, A.; Dijk, D.-J.; Denison, T.; Skeldon, A. C.

2026-02-14 neurology
10.64898/2026.02.12.26346178 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOscillations underpin a large spectrum of brain function. Brain oscillations are altered by neuromodulation approaches including deep brain stimulation (DBS), but a mechanistic understanding of the brain oscillation - DBS interaction is missing. DBS is predominantly used in the treatment of Parkinsons disease. DBS can induce or alter pre-existing narrow frequency band gamma oscillations at half the stimulation frequency. Such half-harmonic responses have been interpreted as entrainment of endogenous oscillations by an exogenous oscillator with an associated Arnold tongue structure. However, half-harmonic responses are not exhibited by all patients. MethodsHere, a Wilson-Cowan model of subcortical neuronal populations is used to set out a broad theoretical framework explaining the heterogeneity of observed responses. ResultsIn the absence of stimulation, the model exhibited either damped oscillations or self-sustained oscillations, depending on parameter values. Off-stimulation behaviour determined observed stimulation response. When oscillations were strongly damped, the only observed response was a driven oscillation at the stimulation frequency. When off-stimulation oscillations were weakly damped, additional half-harmonic responses occurred for sufficiently large amplitude stimulation. When self-sustained oscillations were present they were entrained by the stimulation frequency leading to harmonic, half-harmonic and many other subharmonic responses. Varying stimulation amplitude highlighted hysteresis with the onset and offset of half-harmonic responses appearing at different thresholds. Such two-threshold systems present challenges for adaptive control systems. ConclusionsThis framework captures observed heterogeneity and will help guide future therapeutic practices and the development of adaptive neuromodulation techniques for more effective promotion of physiological rhythms and suppression of abnormal rhythms.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.7%
2
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.5%
3
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
6
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
7
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
11
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
14
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
19
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
29
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%