A meta-analysis of bone conduction 80 Hz auditory steady state response thresholds for adults and infants with normal hearing
Perugia, E.; Georga, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundAuditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) provide an objective method for estimating hearing thresholds in individuals unable to provide behavioural responses. Bone conduction (BC) testing is required to differentiate conductive from sensorineural hearing loss. Accurate BC ASSR threshold estimation relies on "correction" factors, which are not yet well established. This meta-analysis evaluated the reliability of BC ASSR thresholds to estimate hearing thresholds at 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase was conducted to identify studies involving normal-hearing (NH) and hearing-impaired (HI) participants of all ages. Outcomes were (1) the difference between ASSR behavioural and ASSR thresholds, and (2) ASSR thresholds. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the thresholds at the four frequencies. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE approach. ResultsOf records identified, 11 records met the inclusion criteria, yielding a total of 27 studies. Sample sizes ranged from 60 to 249 participants across frequencies and age groups. The quality of records ranged from low to high. Data were synthesised using random-effects models due to heterogeneity. In NH adults, the mean differences ({+/-}95% CI) between BC ASSR thresholds and behavioural thresholds were 17.0 ({+/-}4.8), 15.5 ({+/-}6.0), 13.4 ({+/-}3.3), and 12.1 ({+/-}4.1) dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. In NH infants, mean ({+/-}95% CI) BC ASSR thresholds were 17.2 ({+/-}2.2), 10.5 ({+/-}3.6), 26.4 ({+/-}2.7), and 19.9 ({+/-}4.0) dB HL at the same frequencies. The certainty of the evidence was very low. ConclusionsBC ASSR can be a reliable method for estimating BC thresholds. However, age and frequency significantly impact BC ASSR thresholds, highlighting the need to develop of "correction" factors to accurately predict BC behavioural thresholds. RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42023422150.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural adaptation at stimulus onset and speed of neural processing as critical contributors to speech comprehension independent of hearing threshold or age 94%
- Applicability of a short form of the Speech, Spatial und Qualities of Hearing Scale in 97 individuals with Meniere's disease in a multicentric registry 92%
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss 95%
- Longitudinal Electrocochleography as an Objective Measure of Serial Behavioral Audiometry in Electro-Acoustic Stimulation Patients 94%
- Relationships between the auditory nerve’s ability to recover from neural adaptation, cortical encoding of and perceptual sensitivity to within-channel temporal gaps in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Speech in noise performance in adults with cochlear implants using a combined channel deactivation strategy with a variable number of dynamic focused channels 96%
- The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT™) test: a clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test 95%
- Brainstem Auditory Physiology in Children with Listening Difficulties 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Auditory tests for characterizing hearing deficits in listeners with various hearing abilities: The BEAR test battery 94%
- Neural correlates of masked and unmasked tones: psychoacoustics and late auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) 93%
- Electromyographic Correlates of Effortful Listening in the Vestigial Auriculomotor System 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.