Cannabis Co-Use and Endocannabinoid System Modulation in Tobacco Use Disorder:A Translational Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
P. A. Costa, G.; Gomez, O.; A. Cerezo-Matias, M.; C. Funaro, M.; Sofuoglu, M.; De Aquino, J. P.
Show abstract
Tobacco use disorder (TUD) remains a leading cause of preventable mortality, and existing pharmacotherapies yield 12-month abstinence rates below 30%. As cannabis legalization expands, approximately 18-22% of people who use tobacco report concurrent cannabis use, yet the impact of co-use on cessation outcomes and the therapeutic potential of endocannabinoid system (ECS) modulation remain unclear. We conducted a translational systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science through January 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420250652724). Three study categories were eligible: observational studies of cannabis co-use and cessation outcomes; preclinical studies of cannabinoid modulators on nicotine-related behaviors; and human experimental studies of ECS-targeted interventions. Of 4,869 records screened, 52 studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of 18 observational studies (N=229,630) revealed that cannabis use was associated with 35% lower odds of achieving tobacco smoking cessation (OR=0.65; 95% CI: 0.55-0.78; p<0.0001; I{superscript 2}=88.1%). Preclinical evidence (15 studies) demonstrated that CB1 receptor antagonists robustly reduced nicotine self-administration and reinstatement, while cannabidiol (CBD) attenuated both nicotine intake and withdrawal without affecting food reinforcement. Clinical translation of CB1 receptor inverse agonists failed due to psychiatric adverse effects, but CBD showed promise by reducing cigarette consumption by 40%, reversing attentional bias to smoking cues, and alleviating withdrawal severity. These findings distinguish naturalistic cannabis exposure from potentially beneficial targeted ECS modulation, and support CBD as a promising candidate for adequately powered tobacco cessation trials.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nicotine dependence (trait) and acute nicotinic stimulation (state) modulate attention but not cognitive control: converging fMRI evidence from Go-Nogo and Flanker tasks 94%
- The vagus nerve mediates the suppressing effects of peripherally administered oxytocin on methamphetamine self-administration and seeking in rats 93%
- The Addiction Risk Factor: A Unitary Genetic Vulnerability Characterizes Substance Use Disorders and Their Associations with Common Correlates 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Individual differences in the engagement of habitual control over alcohol seeking predicts the development of compulsive alcoholseeking and drinking 93%
- Bidirectional sex-dependent regulation of α6 and β3 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors by protein kinase Cε 93%
- Effects of acute and repeated administration of the selective M4 PAM VU0152099 on cocaine vs. food choice in male rats 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Cigarette Abstinence in Smokers with no Plans to Quit: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 95%
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
- Nicotine enhances intravenous self-administration of cannabinoids in adult rats 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transitions from smoking to exclusive e-cigarette use, dual use, or stopping nicotine use in ALSPAC and their association with modifiable and sociodemographic factors 94%
- The changing face of nicotine use in England: age-specific annual trends, 2014-2024 91%
- Association of Topiramate Prescribed for any Indication with Reduced Alcohol Consumption in Electronic Health Record Data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.